The Wall Street Journal uses birth-to-death ratios in their analysis. They note that although there were 1,025 white children were born for every 1,000 who died last year, there were 3,940 births to 1,000 deaths for all other groups. And the traditional "White" heartland is not exempt; Schuyler, Neb., a rural town of 6,211 settled by Irish and German immigrants, is now 65 percent Hispanic, up from 41 percent in 2000 and just 4 percent in 1990. At nearby Columbus Community Hospital, between half and 60 percent of the babies born in the past two years were Hispanic. And about 90 percent of the students in the building that houses kindergarten to third graders in Schuyler are Hispanic.
It's obvious that immigrants and Hispanics are fueling the trend. The Times discloses that Hispanics make up the majority of immigrants, and they tend to be younger and have more children, than non-Hispanic whites. Of the total births in the year that ended last July, about 26 percent were Hispanic, about 15 percent black, and about 4 percent Asian. Furthermore, Hispanics are expected to continue outbreeding Whites because while the median age for non-Hispanic whites is 42, meaning the bulk of women are moving out of their prime childbearing years, the median age for Hispanics in only 27, squarely within their peak fertility period. Another indication of America's darkening future is that while there are 348 counties in which Whites are no longer in the majority, that number doubles when it comes to the toddler population.
But the situation may even be more dire than advertised. Gildebrand44 posted the following explanation on Stormfront:
They manipulate statistics as they want. Some 'whites' whom they calculated as whites at this census are not white at all. [Ed. Note: Some mestizos declare themselves as 'white'] Moreover, even the Jews could be calculated as whites... Real white people of European descend became less than 50% of population a lot of time ago. They calculate this way just to misguide people about the real situation. If whites were informed that they are a minority just as soon as it happened, they could resist yet, but now, when the real number of whites in USA is much less than 50%, the resistance is doomed because that is too late. They just tricked whites ones more time.
This development also increases the value of the redoubt strategy, as expressed locally through the PLE (Pioneer Little Europe) concept, and regionally through Harold Covington's Northwest Republic strategy and Hunter Wallace's more nebulous neo-Confederate strategy. Other already White-majority areas potentially suitable as White redoubts include the Ozarks and the Appalachians. The Intermountain West would be good as well, except that the Mormons' infatuation with Hispanics as descendants of the historical Lamanites who need to be "redeemed" could undermine the demographic integrity of a prospective Republic of Deseret. The idea is simple -- if we cannot outbreed the non-Whites, then we must identify and concentrate ourselves in defensible areas where Whites are still the overwhelming majority. "Defensible" means geographically-defensible, with mountains, large rivers, and lakes to serve as natural barriers against invasion.
The redoubt strategy is discussed on this Stormfront thread, where Mattwhiteamerica writes, "Build Super PLEs (town and even city sized) within white areas of the midwest and rocky mountain states. Take over the educational, political and media within these areas. Grow and make normal our ideas within these areas as people are going to have to in the tens of thousands must put their foot down on the feds. We must make life so freaking harsh for the non-whites that they don't want to live within these communities".
Note that the redoubt strategy is not necessarily intended to be a surrender of the rest of the country, but to provide a secure rear base from which we can sally forth and contend for the rest of the country if necessary. But it's a strategy that is clearly moving from desirable to imperative with each passing year.