Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Two Center For Equal Opportunity Studies Unmask Flagrant And Systemic Anti-White Racial Discrimination At The University Of Wisconsin

On September 13th, 2011, the Center for Equal Opportunity (CEO) released the results of two studies regarding admissions at the University of Wisconsin which, in the words of CEO chairman Linda Chavez, constitute "the most severe undergraduate admissions discrimination that CEO has ever found in the dozens of studies it has published over the last 15 years.” Both studies show flagrant and systemic discrimination against White applicants. The studies were based on data supplied by the schools themselves, some of which the university had refused to turn over until a lawsuit was filed by CEO and successfully taken all the way to the state supreme court.

The findings, in summary:

The odds ratio favoring African Americans and Hispanics over whites was 576-to-1 and 504-to-1, respectively, using the SAT and class rank while controlling for other factors. Thus, the median composite SAT score for black admittees was 150 points lower than for whites and Asians, and the Latino median SAT score was 100 points lower. Using the ACT, the odds ratios climbed to 1330-to-1 and 1494-to-1, respectively, for African Americans and Hispanics over whites.

For law school admissions, the racial discrimination found was also severe, with the weight given to ethnicity much greater than given to, for example, Wisconsin residency. Thus, an out-of-state black applicant with grades and LSAT scores at the median for that group would have had a 7 out 10 chance of admission and an out-of-state Hispanic a 1 out of 3 chance—but an in-state Asian with those grades and scores had a 1 out of 6 chance and an in-state white only a 1 out of 10 chance.

-- Read the 24-page study on undergraduate admissions HERE
-- Read the 22-page study on law school admissions HERE

The university wasted no time in attempting to rebut the studies. Interim Chancellor David Ward explained the university uses a "holistic" admissions process, taking into account a range of factors, including grades, test scores, activities, leadership and more. "No one is admitted solely because of race or ethnicity," said Ward. Read the university's complete press release HERE.

But therein lies the rub; the use of the word "solely". This means at some point, they do take race or ethnicity into consideration. And if the CEO study is correct, they give extra brownie points for being Black, Brown, or Asian. That constitutes racial discrimination against Whites.

The data itself is in dispute. While the CEO, using university-supplied data, says that UW-Madison admitted 72 percent of black applicants, 86 percent of Hispanic applicants and 60 percent of white applicants in 2008, the university now claims they admitted 41 percent of black applicants, 62 percent of Hispanic applicants and 55 percent of white applicants in 2008. Only 14 percent of the Wisconsin population consists of non-Whites.

One affirmative action beneficiary also defended the university. Mia McKinney, a UW-Madison senior from Racine and a member of a radical insurgent group called PEOPLE, a program to encourage minorities to apply to the school, said "I took it as a slap in the face and an insult, almost presuming that none of us worked hard and just got here because of the color of our skin...I think that's a huge presumption and assumption". Of course, it probably doesn't occur to her that a White applicant who was rejected because of race might also take it as a slap in the face and an insult.

Other students favoring the university's current programs employed typical mob tactics to disrupt and intimidate. About 45 minutes after Roger Clegg, the president of the Center for Equal Opportunity, convened a press conference to explain the study, more than 100 students and others, mostly non-White, stormed into the room, chanting Communist-style slogans like "power to the people" and "more than our scores" to a steady drumbeat. Clegg packed up his briefcase and left, after which students took over the microphone and began to spout propaganda about the value of diversity.

Dr. Sara Goldrick-Rab, a UW-Madison associate professor of education policy studies and sociology who chairs the committee on undergraduate recruitment, admissions and financial aid, attempts to completely duck the issue by saying on her personal blog that whether or not preferences are being exercised is beside the point, and that the real issue is how they help all students succeed. She then attempts to set up a straw man by complaining about CEO's silence over a disproportionately high black prison population in Wisconsin.

Hat tip to American Renaissance for alerting me to the story. Also discussed on Stormfront.


Anonymous said...

Pat Buchanan was talking about this kind of thing years ago, specifically at Harvard. Given the general population numbers, Whites are more underrepresented at the most elite of the elite "institutions of higher learning" than blacks are.
Not to mention jews are highly overrepresented. (Big shock.)

This is more of Whites being phased out of every area of society, slowly but surely. Wisconsin is certainly no elite school, ive heard its a major party school actually. Regardless, things like these are plain proof that diversity really means the less Whites the better, and eventually, none at all.

Nowadays, a 4 year degree is often worthless, how many "well-educated" White folks are waiting tables or changing oil in cars, cuz they cant get anything in their field?

I don't know who the hell can afford 4-5 years of tuition anyway, unless you want to be in student loan-debt slavery for life.

Plus, its more leftist indoctrination BS, like high school only more blatant.

Hopefully the "college industry" will start to lose big time, and a lot of these diploma mills shut down.

Anonymous said...

I went to the University of Wisconsin-Madison and received my MBA from there. As a hard working white student I pretty well got straight A's. I always found it peculiar that despite my high academic performance, I never was allowed to receive grants, scholarships, or even low interest loans like most of the coloreds on campus. Instead I was always given the highest interest rate loan reserved for white students, even those of very humble means like myself at the time.

Every year the UW Business School sends me the latest copy of their alumni magazine bragging how they are doing their best to inundate students into a multi-cultural experience. I almost puke when I see all of the Negroid, Jewish, Hispanic, and Asian faces, and lack of European faces in their magazine pictorials. Madison used to be a white university and they have done their best to destroy that.

And then every year they have the audacity to send me letters asking me for my hard earned money to fund their scholarship fund intended for minorities which will be used to destroy my white culture and my white people.

The last time they called me I had just about enough and told them to quite calling me for money to fund Negros. In the end the problem was solved by having them put me on their list of angry white men and now they don't call me anymore.

And interestingly, I only met one white person in the UW system that I knew was receiving federal grant money. He told me that the reason he got it was because he was a convicted felon freshly out of the sate penitentiary, and that he was given the money free of charge so that he could be rehabilitated.

I mean WTF? I take it upon myself not to cause trouble and to do the right thing and stay out of prison, and this turd comes along and does exactly the opposite and gets all the financial tuition breaks.

In sum, UW-Madison has been deliberately and maliciously Negroized and it ain't getting better anytime soon.

Anonymous said...

Check out the new ANP Radio-Show on Talk-Shoe! "AA" has graciously added it to the listing on the front-page of this site - thank you! Now all you detractors of Chairman Rocky Suhayda and the American Nazi Party can call-in live and vent your views. Its not face-to-face, but its the next best thing, every sat. night check the listing... I look forward to hearing from you this weekend! Sincerely, Rocky J. Suhayda, Chairman Hail Victory! 88!

Anonymous said...

The NSALP has a story on their web site about another hit by a nigger flash mob on whites. Zog won't do nothing about these, they won't even admit they are racial.

Anonymous said...

As a woman, I attended UW School of Business as well in the mid-70s. At the time, there were very few women in business and we were considered minorities. Let me tell you, I experienced crude sexual comments from my "fellow" classmates and continued to experiece this in the workforce as I worked my way into upper management. This largely went away with the advent of Affirmative Action programs; however, I also "saw" and "felt" the seething rage of white middle-class males who apparently felt they were losing their positions of superiority in the workplace. Don't get me wrong, as there are many "enlightened" men who work in a collegial environment where ALL get to contribute and share in accomplishments. But, there is STILL a group of white middle-class males that will buy into the Tea Party crap.

Anonymous said...

7:01, Im not quite sure what you're getting at. Yes there are plenty of White jerks, middle class, working class etc. Our women need to be respected.
The Tea Party is a joke, not sure how they fot in here though.

But you come off sounding like some kind of anti-White feminist.
If you thought sexist comments from White men in the 70s were bad, how about today where White women are more likely to be sexually assaulted, what with all the "diversity."

As for White men "losing their superiority" well, White men built this country, White men made this country, White men are this country.

Anonymous said...

I find it hilarious how most of the IGNORANT comments on this page is about racial discrimination, YET they sound horrifically racist. There is only 5% minorities on campus. This isn't WHITE America, this is the UNITED States of America. If you cannot stand other races or "puke" every time you see the colored faces on pictorials/brochures, etc then you should drop out of school all together because, evidently, you cannot survive in a world full of different faces. In order to understand your place in society you have to know society and because you do not, you remain ignorant. Minorities, which include Asians, Hispanics and African-Americans (not negroes/niggers, this is 2011), are misrepresented and face way more hardships. It's not an opinion it is a fact that can be proved through statistics. Diversity is not "the less whites the better" it's the MORE difference the better and that has absolutely nothing to do with race. It has to do with personal experiences of which can be shared with students and professors so that we can learn from each other and realize the difference between what you know and what you should learn. Ignorance derives from lack of knowledge and in order to diminish ignorance within an institution you have to give people opportunities and it just so happens that not everyone STARTS off in the same place, but that doesn't mean we cannot end up in the same place.

Anchorage Activist said...

Anonymous 4:04 P.M: This isn't 1964. If non-Whites are experiencing more hardships, it's not because of any legal barriers. It's because of personal choices, family background, and differential abilities. People like you presume every shortfall experienced by non-Whites is attributable to racism.

Affirmative action is morally wrong because it presumes that two wrongs make a right. The growth of the White racialist movement in the United States is attributable to the fact that a growing number of Whites do not feel the scales have been balanced.

BTW, there is no such animal as "African-American". Hyphenated Americanism is invalid; it implies divided loyalty. You're either all American or not American. The more conventional term is "Black".

Anonymous said...

"minorities are misrepresented and face way more hardships."

How wrong you are 4:04. As it has been stated, America is a WHITE nation built by WHITES for WHITES. WE are the most misrepresented, because we are in the process of losing our nation.

Most of the "hardships" non-Whites face are mainly due to their own inability to maintain a civilized society, i.e. third world people make third world countries, not vice versa.

"Minorities" have their own countries they can return to, where they are the majority, and the nation exists FOR THEIR BENEFIT.

We Whites do not have that luxury, as the same thing happening here is happening in just about every other White nation on Earth.

4:04, you are pretty funny, what with your "diversity has nothing to do with race" and of course, the big "I" word, that leftists love, Ignorance. Yep, its all about ignorance. Nothing to do with Whites having a healthy sense of racial identitiy, or having their views shaped by expriences and observations in this multi-cult shit-hole that the USA has become.

Finally, you say we should all "end up in the same place" Now what place is that?

Anonymous said...

"minorities are misrepresented and face way more hardships."

That's because the average Negro in the US has an IQ of 85 which explains why they often have to struggle harder when they are admitted to universities attended by whites who posses greater intellectual skills.

The black intellectual deficit is even worse for blacks who are full blooded Africans. For example, appearing below are the actual average IQ scores for several African nations obtained from standardized IQ testing administered in the year 2000:

Mali: 68
Niger: 67
Nigeria: 67
Angola: 69
Somalia: 68
Senegal: 64

What is astounding is that the US benchmark for mental retardation is widely considered to be an IQ of 70 and the majority of students in many African countries score below that.

In my opinion what UW-Madison has done is subjectively lower the admissions bar for blacks because many blacks simply don't have enough processing power upstairs to compete as well academically with whites. This in turn leads some whites to racially hate blacks because whites are being forced to pass more stringent criteria just to get accepted into the same school, or worse yet get rejected because they are white despite having higher HS grades and higher SAT scores. If this is true, then UW-Madison is clearly inciting racial hatred and should be forced to stop these discriminatory practices immediately.

What UW-Madison has done is throw objectivity out the window which is a formal way of saying that they have subjectively chosen to discriminate against whites. It's like running a foot race, but first chopping off one the legs of some of the faster runners to insure that the slowest runners have an equal chance to win.

Here's the link from which I obtained my IQ stats. I challenge anyone to prove my analysis wrong by presenting facts to refute what I have stated.