-- Comments now closed for this post effective June 26th 10:15 A.M.
Most of the leadership within America's White Nationalist community operates within relatively safe and predictable boundaries. Many have varying degrees of consistent success; we know what to expect from Don Black, Dr. David Duke, Jeff Schoep, and Bill Johnson. A few hardy souls like Paul Mullet, Billy Roper and Alex Linder will experiment with new tactics from time to time out of a natural intellectual curiosity.
But rarely does anyone have the guts to completely step outside the box altogether and propose new thinking. Bill White tried it, but got caught up in the process and made himself vulnerable to the system. Now another White civil rights leader has decided to step outside the box, and already has reaped a minor storm of criticism from those of more limited imagination. American Nazi Party Chairman Rocky Suhayda is now advocating tolerance for gay people who remain discrete and who do not seek to promote homosexuality to the greater society.
Chairman Suhayda published his thoughts in the ANP Report for June 24th, 2011. While Suhayda maintains his implacable opposition to the practice of homosexuality, he recommends distinguishing between gay activists who demand gay worship vs. ordinary gays who strictly want to keep to themselves. Knowing that our resources and appeal are still limited, he rejects the hysterical notion that we should engage in a suicidal charge against all of our racial enemies at once. Here's the question posed by Suhayda, and his answer:
6. QUESTION: What is National Socialism's policy on equal rights for homosexuals? Wouldn't granting them the same rights as heterosexuals be a form of condoning degenerate behavior?
ANSWER - OK, one more time - "homosexuals". Homosexuality, just like prostitution has always been a part of every society. No doubt they always will. The "best" that a NS society can "do" is NOT to PROMOTE it as just another "lifestyle choice", as this current degenerate system does.
Personally, I honestly don't "KNOW" any "homosexuals" either male OR female. I have NEVER been accosted by any sexually either. Oddly enough, when I worked in the hospital field for many years, I DID "know of" many females - mostly "professionals" ala nurses, etc - who were lesbians, and (heaven help me!) they seemed courteous, and even "normal" as "people". Of course, we all know of the "flaming gay parade" types - but I believe that they make up a small percentage of the "gay community" at large - kind of like the costumed bigots in the so-called "movement" who constantly seem to HAVE to SHOVE their brand of "peculiarities" upon the public at large and whom certainly don't "represent" DECENT, NORMAL and INTELLIGENT White Racialists.
Here in Metro-Detroit there is in fact a small city that is known to be virtually a "gay community" - the main street is filled with shops and bars flying the "rainbow" flag, and to be honest it is a clean, neat, little "old town" burg.
The point I'm making is that "gays" tend to WANT to SEGREGATE themselves away from the rest of society - and unlike the "movement types" who have plenty of "talk" but little "walk" - have actually DONE IT, through dedication and effort.
Many "gays" are successful, educated people who for some reason I don't understand desire to lead an un-natural sex-life. Otherwise I personally don't see them (outside the gay paraders) as wild-eyed predatory perverts, running naked through the night with a huge erection, seeking hetero-sexuals to rape and abuse. Let’s admit it, there are no doubt many "gays" (both male and female) who hold the same views on race as we all do.
Personally I like the "don't tell" attitude of bygone days. What business is it of MINE "what" consenting adults "DO" to each other in the privacy of THEIR "four walls"? I will add this - many "hetero-sexuals" - "DO THINGS" that disgust me as much as homosexual behavior. BUT - as long as ANYONE does NOT "force themselves" upon others - is it really any business of MINE or YOURS?
My PERSONAL "policy" is similar to that of "religion" - I personally DON'T desire to KNOW about EITHER of your "SPIRITUAL or SEXUAL" proclivities - UNLESS they are HARMFUL to others. With ALL of the REAL PROBLEMS facing America's White Working Class - these "issues" are petty to ME.
Now remember child-molestation and pederasty are NOT "just gay" crimes. And such terrible actions should be punished with DEATH.
Lastly, NS Germanys dislike of "gayism" (why "gay"?) was based more upon the fact of NO REPRODUCTION of the Folk, than anything else. That’s why "lesbians" were dealt less harshly than male-homo's - in the hope that they MIGHT eventually reconsider bearing children, understanding that "gayism" was NOT a "disease" that would be passed on to the offspring, but rather a un-natural "CHOICE" of the individual to pursue.
As for "equal rights" - well WHAT "rights" don't they have? The "right" to get married and then live through a messy DIVORCE and all that that entails? LOL If its "partner benefits", well all I can state is that in a NS society - since EVERY CITIZEN will be afforded equal state-benefits, without poking into personal-private affairs - they along with every other Folk Comrade - will be covered, IF they EARNED these benefits by their lifelong contributions to the Folk Community.
Actually, Chairman Suhayda goes a bit further than I would. For example, there can be no tolerance of official gay marriage; gay marriage is a solemn mockery of traditional matrimony. If you end up with two daddies, which one do you call "Daddy"? It sows confusion. I also cannot reconcile myself to civil unions because the resultant financial benefits towards gay couples would constitute the implicit public subsidization of the homosexual lifestyle. Tolerating discrete homosexuals does not require public financing of their perversion.
Interestingly enough, the manner in which the gay rights lobbies have organized and the unfortunate success they've achieved in browbeating much of the American public into approving gay marriage could be a role model for us. Would using their tactics result in greater success for our own activism?
Chairman Suhayda also notes that "gayism [is] NOT a disease that would be passed on to the offspring, but rather a unnatural CHOICE of the individual to pursue". I partially agree with this statement; there is no firm evidence that homosexuality is hereditary. However, there is a growing body of evidence suggesting the existence of biological homosexuality; namely, that people are actually born gay, and their first sexual attractions upon reaching puberty are exclusively towards their own sex. In April 2006, two researchers, Dr. Larry Cahill and Dr. Lisa Kirkpatrick, reported on evidence which suggests the brain signatures of gay males may bear a closer resemblance to straight females than to straight males. Here are of couple of excerpts from that post:
Researchers Dr. Larry Cahill and Dr. Lisa Kirkpatrick scanned the brains of 36 healthy men and 36 healthy women to determine the findings. Cahill already knew that the sees use different sides of their brains to process and store long-term memories, base upon his earlier work. The study focused on activity in the amygdala, a cluster of neurons found on both sides of the brain and involved for both sexes in hormone and other involuntary functions, as well as emotions and perceptions. He also has shown that a drug called Propranolol can block memory differently in men and women. The scans also showed that men’s and women’s amygdalas are polar opposites in terms of connections with other parts of the brain. In men, the right amygdala is more active and shows more connections with other brain regions. In women, the same is true of the left amygdala. Scientists still have to find out if one’s sex also affects the wiring of other regions of the brain. It could be that while men and women have basically the same hardware, it’s the software instructions and how they are put to use that makes the sexes seem different. The findings will be published in NeuroImage (this link no longer available).
Implications: This study further enshrines the idea that emotionally, men think with their right brain while women think with their left brain. Perhaps this explains why more men are Republicans and more women Democrats (JOKE). However, the long-term implications are even more fascinating, as it could open up research into other emotional disabilities. It could certainly accelerate research on Alzheimer's Disease.
For example, take homosexuality. Is it possible that in male homosexuals, it's the left amygdala that's more active? And, if so, was it that way at birth, or is there a post-birth triggering mechanism? It's quite possible that a male homosexual is simply a man with a female-wired brain. If this is the case, then further research may unlock a procedure to correct this "wiring" problem. Such a procedure would open up a host of ethical questions. Should taking the "cure" be voluntary or mandatory? While homosexuality is, in my opinion, an emotional disability, most homosexuals confine their activity to consenting adults. Consequently, any "cure" would have to be strictly voluntary. But for the gay-rights movement to block research into "reparative" therapy is to sentence countless people to a lifetime of homosexuality without giving them the hope or option of making a real choice at some point in the future. They act in the same spirit as Galileo's inquisitors, and they may be delaying subsequent research into other emotional disabilities, such as pedophilia.
If the research discussed above proves true, then that means that biological homosexuality may be nothing more than bass-ackward emotional wiring. It's no different than wiring a light switch backward so that it turns on when you flick it down rather than up. This would make it more of a medical issue than an emotional issue. Consequently, this would mean homosexuality is an emotional disability no different than autism or manic-depressive syndrome. This means that our efforts need to be directed more towards controlling how they act rather than how they feel.
Would you purge someone from society simply because they're disabled? Would you purge your own mother simply because she's wheelchair-bound? If your answer to these questions is No, then you ought to think twice before deciding that all homosexuals pose an equal threat.
Reparative therapy is a legitimate option and ought to be vigorously promoted. While not all gays will benefit from reparative therapy, the success rate is promising enough to warrant its promotion. Reparative therapy, like anti-alcoholism therapy, doesn't completely take away the desire; instead, it merely conditions the person to control the desire and re-direct it towards the opposite sex. One of the more successful reparative therapists is Evergreen International; while organized by Mormons, clients of any belief system are accepted.
Rocky Suhayda and the ANP should be proud to have aroused such vocal opposition. It shows that they take risks and are willing to step outside the box and challenge our traditional paradigms. Enough of people who merely want a "seat at the table"; we need a few people willing to kick over the table and start a new game. Some may be inclined to merely settle for a piece of country, but others want the WHOLE freaking country back!