In the latest update on this case, police said a 14-year-old girl has been charged as a juvenile in the beating, while charges are still pending against an 18-year-old woman, now identified as Teonna Monae Brown. The woman declined to be interviewed, according to WBAL Channel 11. In addition, McDonald's has fired Vernon Hackett, the employee who taped the incident.
Update April 25th: Teonna Monae Brown has been charged with one count of first-degree assault and two counts of misdemeanor second-degree assault. She is being held in the Baltimore County Detention Center on $150,000 bond.
The local Baltimore media is now starting to pick up on the claim by Equality Maryland that the white victim of a beatdown by two black female thugs at a McDonald's restaurant in Rosedale, MD, just northeast of Baltimore, is a transgendered woman. Equality Maryland said the victim is a transgender woman and called on state Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler to step in and investigate the case as a hate crime. Some sources have actually identified the victim as Chrissy Lee Polis, and state she was once known as Christopher Lee Polis, but this has not been confirmed by any media outlets. Police and prosecutors said they did not know whether the victim is a transgender woman.
What's not been revealed is if the victim is pre-op or post-op transgendered. If pre-op, it could explain why the conflict originated over the use of the bathroom. Pre-op transgendered women may have all the other physical attributes of a female, including breasts grown from the ingestion of suitable hormones, but may still have a penis because they haven't had what's called "sexual reassignment surgery". So these two black girls walked into the bathroom and might have found the tranny displaying a dick, which provoked a verbal altercation. When the tranny emerged, the fight was on. This doesn't mean the conflict wasn't racial; it simply means that there was another motive.
Major Update: We now have a Baltimore Sun interview with the victim, Chrissy Lee Polis. She confirms she's transgender, and said that she's had "a sex change operation to become a woman", which I interpret to mean sexual reassignment surgery. Video embedded below:
Tentative efforts by white racialists to reach out to the gay community and educate them on the racial aspect have foundered so far. It appears The Bilerico Project has censored a number of comments that, by the follow-up responses, appear to have been posted by white racialists. In a couple of cases, racial slurs may have been used; when you post on those types of forums, it's wise to avoid the use of racial slurs.
So how does the revelation that the white victim is transgendered affect the attitude of the white racialist community towards the victim? This is a good question, since homosexuality is generally considered incompatible with white racialism, and this is one of four questions posed by Occidental Dissent editor Hunter Wallace. Fortunately, a good snapshot of white racialist reaction is provided in this separate Stormfront thread, and much of the opinion towards the victim remains at least cautiously favorable, with a few exceptions. In fact, two out of every three posters expressing an opinion think the tranny's race takes precedence over her sexuality. Here are some of the more typical comments:
Icecut2 April 23rd 8:19 A.M:
Man, what a quandary for the libtards. Talk about the classic 'caught between a rock and a hard place'. Negros are holy, only one step below the sacred Jews. For the unenlightened, libtards must obey the strict rules of PC, politically correct speech. PC dictates that they must never, ever criticize Negros and may only speak of Jews in hushed tones of reverent awe.
Only slightly below Jews and Negros in the PC pecking order are the sexual deviants such as homosexuals and the 'trans-gendered'. For the libtards, criticizing a Negro for assaulting a White person is strictly forbidden. However, not denouncing anyone who assaults a sexual deviant is equally forbidden. I suspect that the libtards will simply blame everything on McDonald's, sweep everything else down the memory hole and declare it a victory for 'tolerance'.
Kranky April 23rd 10:22 A.M:
Nothing is more right than the preservation of one's own Race, and yet I see more and more supposed White Nationalists excuse the murder of members of our race by porch monkeys under certain circumstances. A true White Nationalist believes that under no circumstance may a filthy porch monkey exact jungle law on Our People.
finironcross April 23rd 10:33 A.M:
You can keep the homosexual pervert. He's not "one of mine."
HelveFrost April 23rd 11:14 A.M:
That's true, I see it too much where a white person's death by these animals is celebrated. I see no other races that would turn their backs on someone of their own race, if assaulted by a White. I hate the whole gay, transsexual "culture," but in this case, the person's whiteness comes first. He/she likely didn't get attacked for being a transsexual, more likey because of blacks doing what they do best, which is acting like savages and hating white people.
Crowstorm April 23rd 11:25 A.M:
Does it really matter if the White is a transgendered person? Not that I care about transgendered people... they are a stain in the gene pool... but the savage behavior of Blacks is the issue here, not the confused sex of the victim.
Transgendered or not, this could be YOU the next time you leave your house. YOU could get the tar beaten out of you by a bunch of Blacks if you're not careful. And in this so-called "open society" no one should live in fear of getting beat to death just because they leave the sanctuary of their house.
Most Blacks are savages, pure and simple. And as normal people, what is our moral obligation and duty? To eliminate savages from society. A job that no one is willing to do these days. I mean, 100 years ago, all the decent people would get together and contain the savages, regardless of race.
Savage people who beat up on others shouldn't be allowed to freely roam society. In my perfect world people such as these are taken and thrown off a sea cliff into the ocean.
Iulia April 23rd 12:00 P.M:
Sorry, but if that person is indeed a transgendered, I don't feel any pity for him. Usually gays side with the minorities when a White - non-White conflict takes place. Have you ever seen a pervert feeling pity for a White straight victim? Have you ever seen a f##got condemning an anti-White attack? No, they are always on the side of the libtards' favorites. Look at Western Europe, where gays are beaten, insulted and harrased by Muslims almost on daily basis, and STILL all the gay rights groups are openly pro-immigration.
Sile April 23rd 2:54 P.M:
If you think for one moment that those two heifers beat the tranny for being a tranny, you are very mistaken. The victim was beaten because s/he was WHITE.
Even black females aren't stupid enough to attack a black tranny, mostly because of the beating *they* would take. A black tranny would know *exactly* how to handle them. (See LCR's post on page 2 as to how to defend yourself against a black female.)
They chose to attack the victim because they knew that transgendered or not - s/he was WHITE.
This is a win-win. The more publicity, the better. It'll plant a seed in the minds of the liberal lemmings on oh-so-many-levels. A win in court against the blacks sets a precedent, too. It's something to point to the next time a white person gets beaten. Oh...they were heterosexual...not a hate crime, you say...so, then you are discriminating because of sexual preference? Use their tactics against them. A win for the victim is a win for us. Not as big a win, but it calls out some obvious racial issues in a manner that doesn't give credence to the "evil whitey" defense.
I agree with those who think the victim's race should take precedence over her sexuality. Race relations in Baltimore are known to be more hostile than in other cities of comparable size and influence. In addition, there are some reports that the attackers may have uttered racial slurs during the beatdown. Even if the gay community doesn't want to accept a tactical alliance with us on this issue, the combined effect of gay activism and white racialist activism will put strong pressure upon Maryland authorities not to sweep this under the rug.
I'm sure Sarah Kreager would be one white Baltimorean who would agree.