White Reference is designed for the dissemination of news of interest to the White Nationalist community as well as others interested in such information. This includes reports of crime and oppression against White people worldwide, as well as accounts of White resistance. Display optimized for Firefox.
Photo courtesy of Harry Hughes; many more at the link
The Las Vegas Review-Journal reports that 45 members of the National Socialist Movement showed up in Las Vegas, Nevada on June 5th, 2010 to rally against illegal immigration. The group held shields and flags bearing swastikas, and chanted "deport the illegal aliens,""impeach Obama" and "immigrants go home." They ended their march in front of the Mexican Consulate on 330 S. Fourth St. Police said the group's march ended without incident. There were no counterprotesters; undoubtedly, antifa are now deterred by the fact that the NSM has proven they will fight back against antifa.
In response, Michael Flores, Nevada's director of Reform Immigration for America, claims they're not fighting for amnesty, but a "path to citizenship". However, a path to citizenship that doesn't lead back outside the United States and require the illegals to take their place in line alongside legal immigrants is a de facto amnesty.
Update June 8th: Additional reports are now available. The NSM has included an expanded after-action report on their main website. They reported 45 actual NSM members and six supporters present. NSM regional director Jeff Hall also reported that later in the evening, when three NSM members continued the activism by flying their flags outside the Bellagio Hotel with photographers in tow, antifa attacked both the NSM members and the photographers. Reinforcements from the NSM quickly arrived to put the antis to flight; no injuries sustained by the good guys.
Arizona NSM activist Harry Hughes chose to pass up the Phoenix Rising Rally and participated in the NSM rally in Las Vegas. He posted a first-person report HERE, accompanied by numerous photos.
This was briefly alluded to in my previous post on this issue, but KTVK Channel 3 (Azfamily.com) reports that Prescott City Councilman Steve Blair was actually fired from his talk show by KYCA on Friday June 4th, 2010 because of his controversial remarks criticizing the "Go to Green" diversity mural which gives a Hispanic kid preferential billing over other kids. Blair discussed the issue with the Prescott News. Video embedded below:
People around Prescott continue to have mixed feelings. One resident said, “I think the mural is great. It's wonderful”, while another person said, “I see a giant kid on there and it looks more like graffiti than it does art.” But on Saturday June 5th, it was approximately 500 supporters of the mural who decided to manifest their strength publicly. In this separate story, KTVK reports that dozens of mural supporters showed up to express themselves publicly and protest a decision by Miller Valley Elementary School officials to order the mural's creators to "lighten" the skin tones on the darker kids in the mural. But even before the rally, school officials reversed themselves at the last moment and are allowing the mural to be returned to its original state. KTVK news video embedded below:
Former Prescott Mayor Jack Wilson has called on Steve Blair to resign, claiming the Blair has "sullied the image of Prescott worldwide", and citing the thousands of media and blog sites worldwide which have picked up the story. However, some of the sites cited by Wilson, including the Huffington Post and the Daily Kos, lack credibility because they are partisan left-wing sites. When asked if he would resign, Blair replied, "When my constituents in the city tell me it's time for me to go, and that I'm affecting how the city does its business, I will go. I ran because I wanted to help. If I can no longer do that, I'll step down." But even if Blair ultimately decides to resign, he will be honored for having the guts to speak out publicly against forced diversity and multiculturalism, and then standing firm in defense of his principles.
Prescott News provides more information on when the dispute became public HERE. In the comments section to the Prescott News story on Blair's firing, Adam Rowling exposes some chicanery (no pun intended) on the part of Prescott Alternative Transportation, who directed $5,000 of taxpayer funds to this mural in the first place:
The comments made by Mr. Blair will be his undoing. Fairly or unfairly he will never shake the image his comments created. Councilman Blair will always lose any argument he makes (regardless of topic). Anyone who disagrees will be able to use the, “Blair is a bigot” counter argument. His effectiveness as a council person is severely diminished. Short of holding hands with Jesse Jackson at a Rainbow Push march he will be unable to rebrand himself. He has no one to blame but himself.
The ironic part is that his comments will likely keep the pork barrel mural in place for a longer period of time than his silence would have. It will be difficult to expose the waste of money and frivolousness of the project when the benefactors (PAT) have the race card to play.
This mural project had many legitimate faults that were all visible before the first paint hit the wall. (The mural itself is a quality piece, professionally applied by true craftspeople; the artists are in no way the targets of my criticism).
My criticism of the mural is based on financial responsibility and an ethical obligation of government to work with honest, trustworthy, and non-partisan organizations.
Prescott Alternative Transportation is clearly a leftist organization. PAT is for the redistribution money from the majority to a minority (car drivers to bike riders). For any doubts look up the back grounds of the board of directors and staff. http://www.prescottbikeped.org/board.htm
Prescott Alternative Transportation is willing to operate outside of the law. The office at 309 East Gurley was taxed as an owner occupied residential for two or more years when it only purpose was an office. A residence is taxed at 10 percent and commercial is over 20, so PAT is paying 50 percent less than its share. (The owner of the property is directly related to PAT) Think about this; an organization that uses tax money to operate does not pay its fair share of tax. (Use the yavapai county gis to verify).
Prescott Alternative Transportation is operating a business in a building that is not up to code. Currently PAT has been threatened with a lawsuit by the City of Prescott if it does not come into compliance by July 1st. This office is a non-compliant building and has operated outside of its legal use for many years.
Update June 5th: Calls for Steve Blair's resignation escalate; 500 mural supporters rally in public. Updated post HERE.
A city councilman has spoken out against a diversity mural (pictured in part above) in Prescott, Arizona which is widely perceived as showing an anti-White bias, and it's triggered a firestorm of controversy. The mural, paid for by a taxpayer-funded $5,000 grant from Prescott Alternative Transportation, portrays a Hispanic kid much larger and more prominently than the other kids in the display. The courageous city councilman is absolutely unrepentant and refuses to back down.
Update June 4th: This story has now gone viral. Additional local media stories from KSAZ Channel 10 and KNXV Channel 15, both with video. Discussion now taking place on Stormfront.
According to the Prescott Daily Courier and the Arizona Republic, City Councilman Steve Blair launched the controversy on May 21st, 2010, when during his KYCA radio show, he criticized a new mural being painted on the exterior walls at Miller Valley Elementary School at Prescott's Four Points intersection that depicts children of several races using "green" transportation methods. The mural is entitled "Go To Green", and it's been interpreted as portraying Hispanic kids preferentially. But initially, Blair thought it was a Black kid, so during the May 21st radio show, Blair said, "I am not a racist individual, but I will tell you depicting a black guy in the middle of that mural, based upon who's president of the United States today and based upon the history of this community when I grew up, we had four black families - who I have been very good friends with for years - to depict the biggest picture on that building as a black person, I would have to ask the question, 'Why?'"KSAZ now reports that Blair has since been fired from his radio show for his remarks.
Just this past Wednesday June 2nd, Blair reiterated his concern, again emphasizing that "I'm not a racist by any stretch of the imagination, but whenever people start talking about diversity, it's a word I can't stand." It appears a growing number of Prescott residents share Blair's distaste for the enshrinement of diversity. Blair said he has received a number of calls from long-time Prescott residents who ask, "Who authorized that graffiti on the wall?" He added: "What these people don't like is somebody forcing diversity down their throats." According to City-Data, Prescott, with a population of 42,697 as of July 2008, is 88 percent White and 8 percent Hispanic.
Bingo, Steve! You figured it out. Many Americans are getting sick and tired of the constant promotion and enshrinement of this mythical diversity as the panacea for all our social ills. Not a day passes when we have to listen to some wanker rhapsodize about the "rich diversity". It's become positively Orwellian -- and utterly nauseating.
One of the most persistent myths about the Holocaust is the Jewish soap story. In the past, Holocausters frequently proclaimed that the Germans boiled down Jewish fat and turned it into soap. Despite the fact that respected scientists and historians have since debunked the story as a myth, as pointed out by the Institute for Historical Review's Mark Weber, the Jewish soap myth dies hard.
In March 2010, a bar of soap purported to have been made from Jewish fat was seized from a Montreal curiosity shop following a media frenzy. The shopkeeper, Abraham Botines, said he bought it from a former soldier and that it was from Poland circa 1940. B'nai Brith Canada sent a representative to the shop to investigate and filed a police complaint. Subsequently, in a March 2010 interview with The Canadian Press, Botines admitted he really had no idea whether the soap was actually made of human remains, but he wanted to sell it because he no longer wished to keep it.
Now, the Canadian Press reports that analysis performed by a laboratory in southern Ontario specializing in older items reveals the soap tested negative for human or animal DNA. Insp. Paul Chablo said police received the results this week, a few months after sending the beige bar of soap to be analyzed. "The results were negative and the conclusion is clear: no detectable quantity of DNA was found to be present within the bar of soap...It's just a regular bar of soap," said Chablo. No charges will be filed, and the soap will be returned to Abraham Botines.
Even a local Jewish supremacist admits defeat. Alice Herscovitch, the director of the Montreal Holocaust Memorial Centre, says there is no point in preserving such an item and that it has no historical value. "If anything, it was an object that glorified, rather than educated about, the Holocaust...What it shows is that people try to profit from the Holocaust as they try to profit from anything else."
The latter has got to be the understatement of the century. It is because of stories like these that many of us in the White Nationalist community believe the Holocaust is still worthy of discussion, even though there are more pressing issues. Too many lies about the Holocaust continue to be disseminated. Too many people in Europe are incarcerated merely for publicly suggesting variants. And Israel continues to perpetrate and justify provocative and even homicidal behavior by citing the Holocaust. More discussion of this story on Stormfront.
The Southern California Anti-Racist Network has published their own after-action report on the confrontation between their activists and National Socialist Movement cadre in Jeff Hall's Riverside, California neighborhood on May 29th, 2010, and while it appeared reasonably accurate, they did wildly over-inflate the number of NSM cadre present to cover up their own embarrassment at being routed by a numerically smaller force (official NSM after-action report now available). Here's how the report starts out:
In the latest anti-fascist action to occur in this conservative inland city , a small group of anti-fascists planned to out Jeff Hall, the California "commander" of the Michigan-based National Socialist Movement (NSM), outside of his house. They were violently confronted by about thirty Nazis, who brandished firearms and threatened the safety of the demonstrators.
Thirty Nazis? Let's look at the video:
I distinctly counted no more than eight NSM cadre who sallied forth and actually confronted the antifa. Of course, there may have been more in reserve, but I judge by what I see on the video. So the antifa are deliberately inflating the total to cover their own embarrassment and being chased away by a smaller force. Who taught the antifa to count, anyway; Elie Wiesel?
Here is another pertinent excerpt of the report:
However, due to the the overwhelming presence of California human rights defenders at the National Day of Action for Arizona, turnout was relatively low. Only about seven members of the SoCal Antiracist Network were present, backed up by a contingent of about five Brown Berets. "Our reason for being there was to be security, to get Chicanos out of there if anything happened. We were not there to break any laws, we were not intending to go into the house," said of the the leaders from the Brown Berets.
Four police officers in riot gear were at the end of the cul-de-sac where Hall lives, and the police helicopter hovered overhead. Once the antifascists took their stand, a crowd of about thirty Nazis in full fascist costume swarmed out of the house and confronted one of the organizers. "We're not here to fight," he explained, and backed up about thirty feet. The Nazi charged him aggressively, but the antiracist defended himself, knocking the Nazi out cold at the end of his charge. The Nazis continued their offensive against the antiracists, chanting "Get the girl!" and attempting to strike the only woman present, a member of the Brown Berets. They brandished two firearms as police looked on, refusing to intervene in the violence. "If you don't like it, get out of here," one of the officers told a member of the Berets.
In light of the armed Nazi aggression, the antiracists withdrew their picket for the day. The antifascist struggle in Riverside, however, is anything but over.
In my previous post about this confrontation, I reported 10 antifa, but their total of 12 is reasonable. The bottom line - the antifa were put to flight by a numerically smaller force. And in the comments section of the report, they took some criticism from other antifa for targeting a residential neighborhood. One of the NSM members present also posted this comment (typos cleaned up):
Stupid Move, by Brian: Monday, May. 31, 2010 at 8:37 PM
I was one of the NSM members that combated these cowards; I must say this is the funniest lie yet
Not only did they lie about numbers but they forgot to mention that the 3 brown berets that were there were the first few to run off with a guy in a ski mask who had [lead] gloves, using those gloves to hit one of our members. Myself and another member cornered this guy as you can see in the video and he just ran like a coward. Yeah, some men you recruited.
All I have to say to that low life Kevin Atkin is I hope your happy putting our lives in jeopardy along with Jeff's family, innocent civilians, and themselves. It will come back to bite you in the ass some day.
This was long overdue. Finally, antifa got a taste of their own medicine. This can also be considered part payback for what antifa did after the L.A. rally, when they threw bricks at the NSM cadre in the parking lot.
