You can read the entire story with the interview HERE. The interview portion is replicated below. In my estimation, Hall did a good job, keeping the answers short, succinct, and literate at the same time; I'd give him a "B". But there are a few points I would have added to some of these answers; they're included in red (interview begins after the jump):
Question: First and foremost, what is the purpose of this rally? Why is the NSM doing it?
Answer: To let people know we are here. We’re going to be running candidates soon, and they’ll be getting political seats. It’s going to be big, and [by electing government officials] that’s how we’re going to reclaim the southwest.
Question: Knowing that Los Angeles is predominantly cohabitated by what would otherwise be considered minorities, why would you choose to hold such an offensive protest here?
Answer: Because it’s a sanctuary city – that’s what we’re fighting against. Crime rates are out of control, and a lot of lives have been lost due to unregulated immigration.
Question: Why would now be a good time to protest immigration?
Answer: The NSM has been growing for over 35 years, and we keep growing. We have a lot of new growth in the West. It’s time to flex our muscles out here; to let the people know we’re here and that we’re going to get people into office.
Analysis: I would have added a couple of one-liners about the EFFECTS of mass immigration. I would have said, "An increasing number of Americans are finding it difficult to get a job in this part of the country unless they speak Spanish; American teenagers are being frozen out of starter jobs at places like McDonald's because they lack Spanish. This is reverse colonization".
Question: What exactly is the objective of electing NSM officials into office? How would nationalist socialists differ from other socialist candidates?
Answer: Here’s the issue: You can’t take money from one group and give it to another. There’s so many people – different religions, cultures, races, etc. – pushing and pulling in different directions, that it’s hard to have strong, widespread socialism [without nationalism].
Question: If America is the melting pot of the world, how can you claim any race has superiority over any of the others?
Answer: America is a white country; it’s always been a white country. We’re not just talking about the original 13 colonies, we’re talking about manifest destiny – we’re talking about the great white manifest destiny. We came and fought for this land. One race. One nation. It’s a lot simpler when you’re supporting your own people; people you understand, people you can relate to do.
Question: By your definition, the Aryan race would include Celts, Russians, South Africans, Australians, etc. How would nations as culturally diverse as these avoid influencing white American culture? Isn’t “American” culture already a mixture of numerous cultural contributions anyway? How would you separate yourselves?
Answer: We’d be happy with seceding – creating our own land. Why can’t we whites have a white nation? [Immigrants] keep pushing their cultures, influencing white culture – our culture. What would happen if all of us went to Japan and just waited around in the streets? What if we decided to start marching through their cities, demanding rights? Demanding reform from their governments and leadership? First and foremost, we are essentially a white civil rights group. We’re patriots.
Analysis: Excellent answer - this effectively rebuts any charges that the NSM stands for genocide of non-Whites.
Question: With the influence of American culture on virtually every other culture on the planet, how does the NSM rationalize that there is a violation of white civil rights?
Answer: There’s the ACLU. There’s the United Negro College Fund. There are all-black schools – we couldn’t have an all white school, they would call it “racist.” Anything we do is “pro-hate.” How many white boy or white girl college funds do you see? We are being discriminated against. There’s nothing wrong with being white. There’s nothing wrong with having our own nation.
Analysis: Good starter answer. I would have added, "What we have at this point is precursor discrimination; a double standard imposed upon Whites. Whites are held to a higher and harsher standard than non-Whites. Anti-racists stoke up people with false doctrines about white privilege and claim that non-Whites cannot be racist because they don't have power. Corporations and public employers alike act as proxy enforcers of political correctness and have lower hiring and retention standards for non-Whites".
Question: But you are imitating Nazis. Especially in a city as diverse as LA, you have to know how offensive that will be to people. Why Nazis?
Answer: The Nazis were National Socialists. The negative connotation is just propaganda. It was a failed war that failed the Nazis, not failed National Socialism.
Analysis: I would have expanded upon this, saying "until 1939, Germany had made remarkable progress under National Socialist, transforming itself from a prostrate beggar to an economic and military powerhouse. Only under the exigencies of a war that Hitler never really wanted did the National Socialist experiment unravel and ultimately melt down in tragedy".
Question: What about the swastikas, a symbol now associated with hatred and intolerance?
Answer: How many people that hate swastikas have even read “Mein Kampf?” Think about here in America: we had prison camps for the Japanese.
Analysis: I would have answered this differently, saying I recognize that many of our older and more prominent citizens fought against the swastika, some making supreme sacrifices. We honor their spirit. But the swastika has been wrongfully demonized and misrepresented by those who wish to do our race harm. Our mission isn't merely to motivate and activate the White community, but also to de-stigmatize an honorably-conceived symbol egregiously misrepresented".
Question: But we didn’t kill millions of them in these prison camps...
Answer: Millions? The Red Cross put the number at less than 275,000. I’ve heard six million. I’ve heard 50 million. You know why the number is never the same? It never happened. Most of the Jews in World War II died from Typhus, or disease, or hunger. I’m a denier. I don’t believe in the Holohoax. You know that sign that was recently stolen, at Auschwitz? Do you know what it said? “Work will set you free.” It was a labor camp, not a death camp. How could you get anything done if you killed six million of your workforce?
Analysis: I would not have said I was a "denier"; that marginalizes us. Instead, I would have said that we're Holocaust skeptics. And I wouldn't have used the term "Holohoax" in a serious media interview. We don't deny that millions of Jews and others were targeted, rounded up, incarcerated, worked under hard labor, and died; we just believe the Holocaust became deliberately exaggerated for political purposes. In particular, we dispute the singularity attached to the Holocaust, that Jewish extremists believe it to be the penultimate genocide and minimize other genocides, such as the 100 million who perished under world Communism and the 50 million unborn babies who've been slaughtered in America since Roe v. Wade became the standard in 1973. We take issue with the fact the Europe jails respectable law-abiding citizens for airing such doubts publicly.