British National Party Chairman Nick Griffin Issues Appeal For Funds To Help With Upcoming Struggle Against Commission For Equality And Human Rights

Since my previous post on this issue, I've learned that British National Party Chairman Nick Griffin has issued a fresh appeal for funds to help the BNP in its upcoming fight against the Commission for Equality and Human Rights (CEHR), which is taking the BNP to court over its constitution which states that only Indigenous Caucasian and defined ethnic groups emanating from that race are allowed to join. In the video embedded below, Griffin points out that the CEHR is trying to destroy the British National Party in two ways; demographically, and financially:



The four options spoken of are set forth below. Only Option 1 is available to foreigners, since one must be both a British citizen and White to become an actual member of the BNP. But I'm sure Griffin will appreciate financial help from Whites worldwide. Preservation of the BNP could facilitate the establishment of pro-White parties in the United States, Canada, and Australia.

4 WAYS YOU CAN HELP

1.	Send an urgent donation - please use the following link https://secure.bnp.org.uk/donate/ or to send an urgent donation by telephone ring: 0871 0500 234
2.	Show your loyalty to the Cause of British Nationalism by becoming a Life Member. To become a Life Member online use the following link https://secure.bnp.org.uk/life/ or to become a life member by telephone: 0871 0500 234
3.	Become part of the 'elite' by upgrading or joining as a Gold Member. To become a Gold member online use the following link https://secure.bnp.org.uk/gold/ or to become a Gold member by telephone: 0871 0500 234
4.	Join the BNP - Join the British Resistance! To become a BNP member online use the following link https://secure.bnp.org.uk/join/ or to become a member by telephone: 0871 0500 234

Snail mail address: Please send all cheques / PO’s (suggest international money order), made payable to British National Party or British Heritage, to:

PO Box 831
Newport
Gwent
NP20 9HL

Please note you MUST supply your name and address, otherwise the money goes straight to asylum seekers, the Lib/Lab/Con fat cats and other scroungers.

How much is Nick Griffin looking for in the short term? In his September 2nd statement, Griffin said that if the party wanted to fight the case all the way, it would need to raise an extra £80,000 during the next four weeks. Some £20,000 would be needed this week to buy in more top lawyers’ time to triple check and hone to perfection the changes the party would have to make in its constitution and organisation. And that's only through the October 15th hearing.

Black-On-White Mob Assault On Marty Marshall And Greg Alchier In Akron, Ohio On June 27th, 2009 Flushed Down The Memory Hole

Remember the black-on-white mob assault upon Marty Marshall and Greg Alchier in Akron, Ohio which took place on June 27th, 2009? First discussed in this previous post, a group of up to 50 black teens jumped a white man in his own neighborhood without provocation, yelling "This is a black world" and other racially-oriented epiteths. Marshall suffered a concussion and multiple bruises to his head and eye, and spent five nights in the critical care unit at Akron General Medical Center. He hasn't been able to work a full week since the attack, and he had no insurance.

It seems like the story has been flushed right down the memory hole. WJW Channel 8 unexplainedly pulled their video of the news story. There has been virtually no media attention directed towards this story since that time. The most recent coverage was published by the Akron Beacon-Journal on August 4th, 2009. And that story did NOT report any arrests or that the cops are investigating it as a hate crime.

Instead, the Beacon-Journal reported that a so-called "healing event" took place near the location where the beating occurred. Marshall's brother, the Rev. Steve Marshall of Maranatha Bible Church, spoke during a National Night Out event against the crime held at Firestone Park, and said, "This was not an issue of race. This was an issue of the heart". The Rev. Marshall also said his brother has not allowed the attack to have in his heart hatred for his black brother or black sister or anybody of a different nationality. "The justice he would like to see is that no other kids or families would be assaulted like this,", explained Marshall. And, he said, his brother wants those who beat him to turn around and go in the right direction. [Ed. Note: The "right" direction would be for the attackers to report to the nearest police station and turn themselves in. And how could the idiot reverend say it's not about race when the attackers were screaming racial epiteths?]

Others present at the event included Akron District 7 City Councilwoman Tina Merlitti; Billy Soule, assistant to Akron Mayor Don Plusquellic for community relations; and Dioswal Johnson, a 17-year-old Firestone High School senior who represents some hearts-and-flowers group called Akron PeaceMakers, a group of area youth who work to promote peace and speak out against drugs and violence.

It looks like the city of Akron is trying to cover this up and throw Marty Marshall under the bus. What's the Akron Police Department doing about it? Are we really supposed to believe that they can't find any of the 50 blacks who participated in this beatdown? Why has the Akron Beacon-Journal allowed this story to slide down the memory hole? And why is Marshall's preacher brother talking "forgiveness" instead of justice and restitution? You can bet a couple of other reverends called Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton wouldn't be talking forgiveness. Here's a post on Current.com that's asking the same questions.

How Respectable White Folks In Provo, Utah Celebrate After A Football Victory (BYU 14-13 Over Oklahoma)

Here's an example of how respectable White folks celebrate after a football victory. And it wasn't just any football victory - Brigham Young University upset Oklahoma 14-13 down in Texas. Some Utah college football fans are considering it the school's greatest football victory ever. If interested, you can read about the game on the Provo Daily Herald website.

In Detroit, there would have been a full-scale riot. Cars would be overturned and torched. Wild blacks with dreadlocks a-flyin' would be raping, rampaging, and pillaging. But absolutely none of that took place in Provo. About the only thing the cops had to do was to keep the celebrants from blocking traffic.

And as you can see from the KSL Channel 5 video embedded below, blacks were not a problem:

Video Courtesy of KSL.com

This is the way America once was - when it was 89 percent White. Before mass immigration, when the world started puking its demographic guts all over our country. Before diversity became more important than competency and safety.

Adapt Or Die: British National Party Chairman Nick Griffin Explains Why The BNP Must Consider Accepting Non-Whites As Party Members

British National Party Chairman Nick Griffin, who also serves as an MEP (Member European Parliament), is preparing his party for the very real possibility that they must accept non-whites as party members in the very near future.

According to a September 3rd Guardian article, the Commission for Equality and Human Rights (CEHR) is taking the BNP to court over its constitution, which states that only Indigenous Caucasian and defined ethnic groups emanating from that race are allowed to join. In the wake of that action, the BNP first insisted it would fight the case. But Griffin, speaking after a September 2nd hearing at the Central London county court was adjourned for seven weeks, appears to be re-considering, saying that the party should now change its membership rules.

"It is now crystal clear to all concerned that we simply do not have a choice but to change our membership policy," said Griffin. "Adapt or die is the only decision left to make, for failure to adapt would lead either to our being bled white through the courts or crushed by new criminal laws." Griffin said the party would hold a series of debates over the coming weeks to discuss the matter and then stage a mass meeting for members where they would require a two-thirds majority to rewrite the constitution.

At the September 2nd hearing, Judge Paul Collins ruled the BNP had 21 days to serve its evidence, with a further 14 days for the claimants to respond before the next one-day hearing, scheduled for October 15th. But regardless of what the court decides in October, Griffin believes the forthcoming Equality Bill will, in any case, ban any political party from discriminating on grounds of ethnicity. In the following YouTube video, BNP Deputy Leader Simon Darby interviews Griffin, who explains the situation in greater detail:



On the BNP website, Griffin further explains the financial situation. His full statement is included. He states that it could take as much as £1.0 million to fight the ruling all the way to the House of Lords. Arrayed against the BNP is a state-funded bureaucracy which can call upon as many as 70 lawyers and a budget of up to £70.0 million. Griffin believes the disparity is so great that the BNP could not even hope to compete, never mind actually win. So instead, he proposes to take one large step backward now so that the BNP can continue to take many smaller steps forward in the future. Rather than raising up to £1.0 million merely for litigation, the BNP would raise money to grow the party by spreading its message, recruiting new members, and identifying and running candidates in various elections. Another BNP figure, Lee Barnes, discusses how to soften the impact of this decision as much as possible on his blog.

Reaction: A rather mixed reaction on Northwest Nationalists, which is pro-White but anti-Griffin. One person accuses Griffin of wanting to bring in wogs in order to increase dues revenue. Also a mixed reaction on Stormfront, although the majority understand the BNP's dilemma and support the organization.

While I wish it wasn't necessary for the BNP to take this step, I understand why they are contemplating it. Since the BNP has over 100 elected officials, it is a proven positive force in British politics. British patriots have no effective electoral alternative to the BNP at this time, so its survival is imperative, and it must adapt to survive. I wish Mr. Griffin and the rank-and-file well. But if the BNP does go ahead and admit non-whites to membership, what they must then look out for are attempts by notorious antifa groups such as Lancaster UAF, Searchlight, and Hope Not Hate to recruit non-whites and deliberately steer them into two or three local BNP organizations so that they'll become a majority and sever those local organizations from the national BNP. Anti-racists will stoop to any tactics to disenfranchise the white community.

Freedom14 Crashes The Orange International Street Fair Near Chapman University In Orange, California, Promotes Message Of White Empowerment

One of the secrets to Freedom14's success is flexibility. They react to changing conditions and exploit the windows of opportunity which open up.

And on Saturday September 5th, 2009, Freedom14 employed a new tactic for them - piggybacking. They piggybacked on the Orange International Street Fair just a block or so from Chapman University in Orange, California, taking advantage of the availability of the resultant audience to broadcast their message of white empowerment by distributing their immigration flyer once again. Read their complete after-action report, with photos, posted on this Stormfront thread. This activism also attracted the attention of Western Voices World News, the official news site of European Americans United.

This is Freedom14's second deployment to Orange. Their first deployment back on August 22nd was initially fruitful, but was shut down early because of an officious representative of an unidentified city council member who threatened to get them banned. Unfortunately, their second deployment also got shut down early; an interesting explanation is offered in their report:

Such a massive literature distribution was bound to attract attention from festival authorities, especially since many of the F14 activists were proudly sporting their new Freedom14 t-shirts. One handsome F14 activist caught the eye of an extremely attractive security official (pictured right, left side of frame) who wouldn’t let him alone. After refusing to giver her his phone number, the rejected official placed the entire festival under martial law, suspending the constitution and discontinuing the First Amendment. Down to only the barest minimum of backup pamphlets, many of the folks from F14 thought it best to call it a day and break the heat by quenching their thirst with some of the finest culture around.

The fact that Freedom14 was down to their "barest minimum of backup pamphlets" implies that the security official basically closed the barn door after the horse escaped; Freedom14 had virtually accomplished all of its mission by that time anyway. So it didn't really matter.

California is staggering under an unbearable burden. Politics as usual will not save this state from the financial and social crises that entrenched, decades long corruption and mismanagement have brought upon the remaining white population of this state. Californians who form the backbone of this state are nearly at the point where it has actually become impossible for them to continue funding their government’s spending habits. And many of them are receptive to Freedom14's message, some enthusiastically so.

Neither security officials nor hit pieces in the local paper stop these folks from accomplishing their mission.

Orange County Register Publishes Hit Piece On Freedom14 And The Golden State Party

On September 4th, 2009, the Orange County (CA) Register published an article on Freedom14 and the Golden State Party that, from the top down, can be best characterized as a hit piece designed to drive people away from these worthy organizations. The very title of the article, "Two-time felon runs pro-white political group", is designed to provoke fear and repulsion. Read the full article HERE. Also a discussion thread on Stormfront.

There's also a poll embedded within the story asking people if they would register with the Golden State Party. A few more Yes responses would be in order.

Other examples of bias against White activists and pro-White activism in the article include use of phrases like "self-proclaimed European-American group", excessive citation of anti-White hate groups like the Anti-Defamation League as information sources, and derogatory word association with groups like the Supreme White Alliance, from whose ranks a couple of boneheads who got arrested for allegedly threatening Barack Obama sprung. It is a common tactic by anti-racists to lump all pro-White advocacy groups together regardless of the quality of their activism, in order to present White nationalism in the most unfavorable light possible.

But there is some truth in the article. Tyler Cole, 26, of Mission Viejo, who is listed as the chairman of the Golden State Party in a letter to the Secretary of State, is indeed a two-time felon. Cole was convicted of assault with a deadly weapon in 2001 in Arizona and sentenced to a year in prison. He was then convicted in 2008 in Orange County of possession of an illegal machete, possession of marijuana and resisting arrest. He served two months in Orange County Jail and is currently on probation. The first conviction was obviously bonafide and represented a serious mistake on his part; such things happen. But the second conviction seemed a bit more anecdotal and even political, probably because of his status as an ex-con; possession of a machete by itself does not make one a threat to the community. And merely talking back to a police officer can sometimes bring a resisting arrest charge.

Thus the pundits cited in the article question whether a two-time felon can actually grow a new political party, and that is not an illegitimate question. Another concern expressed is Cole's use of different names. According to the article, he has used the names Eugene Cameron, Tim Robbins, and Tyler Robbins on different venues. But what really attracted the Register's scrutiny was the fact that Cole posed as Eugene Cameron, a supporter of the Golden State Party, in an interview with the Orange County Register on August 24th. A reporter had contacted him by e-mailing Freedom 14's "contact us" link on their website. Subsequently, the Register found information sources showing that Cameron and Tim/Tyler Robbins are the same person as Cole. When the Register followed up by contacting Cole, he allegedly denied knowing anything about Eugene Cameron, and did not respond to repeated requests for further comment.

Now we have a problem. When first interviewed on August 24th, Tyler Cole, as the chairman of the Golden State Party, should have immediately identified himself by his real name, and explained that Eugene Cameron was merely an online pseudonym. Many people use online pseudonyms to protect themselves against retaliation; it is an accepted practice. However, by not owning up to his real name immediately, he has exposed the Golden State Party to criticism and possible defamation. At the very least, the media will now treat him as a crank rather than as a serious person.

Even Freedom14 administrator Tom Gray has expressed some concern. Gray, in an e-mail to the Register, said Cole has been using the alias "Eugene Cameron" in an effort to disassociate himself with his past. Gray said he was unaware of Cole's history until The Register shared the criminal court records. Gray said Cole then admitted the deception. "He really went to great lengths to keep us from the truth about his past," Gray wrote in an e-mail. "He invented many myths to fill in the gaps in his past that were particularly unpleasant... . While what Tyler did is certainly wrong…he has paid his dues and is a changed man. I can fully sympathize with why he chose to go to such great lengths to avoid being linked to his past."

Gray was quoted as further saying that members sometimes use pseudonyms in public and online to "mess with (people) a bit" but that Freedom14 members had believed Cole's real name was Eugene Cameron.

Naturally, the Jews jumped into the fray. Joanna Mendelson of the Anti-Defamation League wasted little time in playing the "anti-Semitic" and "white supremacist" cards. "They're trying to (attract) European Americans with anti-immigration as one of the core issues, which is all main stream," said Mendelson. "But when you scratch the surface, you discover this is a group that is white-supremacist oriented." She also falsely claimed that Freedom14 took their name from the "14 Words", although they've previously stated that they took the name because 14 activists came together at the group's formation.

But Mendelson doesn't limit her definition of "white supremacy" merely to describe a group that promotes violence. She also claims that merely calling for the advancement of white citizens is enough to earn the label. "A white nationalist is essentially synonymous with the term white supremacist," she said. "That is one term they use to refer to themselves, which carries less negative connotative significance." Of course, the intent of proposing such a broad definition of "white supremacist" is to psychologically intimidate whites against ever speaking out in their own defense at any time. Jews want to silence whites altogether.

But Freedom14 and the Golden State Party reject any comparison to neo-Nazis. "(We) wish the ADL would leave us alone; we are not a hate group," Cole said in the interview with the Register in which he called himself Eugene Cameron. "White America has developed a complex… it's OK to think in terms of your ethnic heritage. We don't hate non-whites. That's not what we're about." Freedom14 also continues to do well in the poll currently active on my sidebar, placing third with 15 votes.

This article is a classic example of how the media does a hit piece on us; they mix truth with fiction, exaggerating mistakes on our part to present the most damaging portrait of our Cause.

National Anarchism: Sacramento National Anarchists Collective (SNAC) Launches The "White Cross Patrol" To Provide Essentials To White Homeless People

A relatively new way to express White racial consciousness has begun to take root, primarily in California for the time being. The philosophy used is National Anarchism, and the premise is tribalism. National Anarchists believe tribes can be organized around any matter of common interest - including race.

The Sacramento National Anarchists Collective (SNAC) has organized for the purpose of promoting White racial consciousness through service to the community in general, but in particular, to the White community. The term "collective" is roughly akin to the term "unit" used by other pro-White groups such as the National Alliance and the National Socialist Movement. One of their current projects is what is called the White Cross Patrol. According to SNAC's blog, the purpose of the White Cross Patrol is to distribute essentials such as toothbrushes, razors, hygiene products, space blankets and educational materials to the homeless and needy of their area. A YouTube video brings the program to greater life:



Some previous examples of constructive activism by SNAC include beach cleanup, AIPAC protests, cystic fibrosis fundraising and march, protest and support at the Palestinian Freedom march in San Francisco, distribution of educational materials, community camping trips, Tea Party protests, and fundraising car washes. Other more traditional White activist groups such as the National Alliance and the NSM have started to adopt this more service-oriented model more and more; both organizations are involved in Adopt-A-Highway litter control programs in Kentucky (NA) and Springfield, MO (NSM).

Another National Anarchist group nearby is Bay Area National Anarchists (BANA). They engage in similar service-oriented activism in the San Francisco Bay Area; one of their most noteworthy accomplishments was their protest of the so-called Folsom Street Fair, where faggots are allowed to take over a small portion of San Francisco and openly and shamelessly engage in public fellatio, water sports (none of which are sanctioned by the IOC, by the way), fudge-packing, and various forms of BDSM. While kids are nominally prohibited from entering the area, the prohibition is not rigorously enforced, and so BANA took to the streets in protest. Another source of information on BANA is the BayAreaPerspectives blog.

National Anarchists do not have an overall "Commander" or "Chairman" like the more black-shoe organizations. Each collective is relatively autonomous. One of the leading intellects of National Anarchism is Andrew Yeoman; read a profile of him on the BayAreaNationalAnarchists blog.

Acceptance of National Anarchists by other anarchists and tribalists is conditional. A lengthy December 2008 Infoshop article provides a mainstream anarchists' perspective on National Anarchism. While somewhat critical, it is well-written and attempts an intellectual rather than an emotional approach. Some anarchist groups accept them, but anti-racist anarchists look upon them as the enemy.

Acceptance of National Anarchists within the greater White nationalist community can also be conditional. While some traditional WNs consider them a bit "too Red", more progressive WNs see the possibilities. They do take some heat in this Stormfront thread from traditionalists. National Anarchism has taken root in Northern California because other anarchists and tribalists thrive in the area; thus, National Anarchists have adopted an approach which blends in well with the local cultural background. This is similar in concept to Freedom14 in Southern California, who fits in well with the prevalent casual beach culture there. National Anarchism seems to be a valid form of White activism.

National Socialist Activist Bill White Alleges Existence Of "Operation Hopeful Eagle", Intended To Replace Leading White Activists With FBI Stooges

This is potential dynamite - I broke off constructing another post to publish this. Frazier Glenn Miller has received a letter from national socialist activist Bill White, and posted it on the Vanguard News Network Forum. In this letter, White alleges that the Federal government has initiated a program called "Operation Hopeful Eagle" to target and trump up charges against all perceived "white supremacists" not on the FBI payroll, and replace them with FBI stooges. His personal belief is they are trying to put people in place to cause a major "domestic terrorism" incident, which they can blame on the "white supremacist" movement and use it as an excuse for a general crackdown, which would be fueled by manipulated "public opinion".

The letter is dated July 28th, 2009, and so refers to some current events effective as of that date. The reason for the delay is because it was sent to a P.O. Box in Springfield, Missouri that Glenn Miller does not check very often:

July 28, 2009

Glenn;

I am writing everyone who has been kind enough to write to me, to share news of my acquittal. Last Tuesday, Judge Alderman dismissed the Chicago, Illinois indictment against me, noting that it violated my civil rights and that I had been wrongfully imprisoned.

I have not yet been released. First the government attempted to stay my release. This was rejected Friday. Now, the government has made another argument which will be decided this Friday.

When I was arrested, I was indicted in two different districts for essentially the same offense. The Illinois indictment has been cleared, but the Virginia indictment, which, at this point, must be dismissed, is on the books until I return there. The government is arguing I must be detained until I return; we are arguing I should not be detailed on an indictment known to be invalid.

Regardless, I will be released either this weekend or in 40 days.

Hal Turner, who, you may recall, I tried to warn was under investigation, may have his case dismissed based on the precedent established in mine.

If you are still on VNN or other websites, I'd ask you to get the word out that my arrest was the first in what the government calls "Operation Hopeful Eagle" - a program to trump up charges against all perceived "white supremacists" not on the FBI payroll, and replace them with FBI stooges. My personal belief is they are trying to put people in place to cause a major "domestic terrorism" incident, ala Oklahoma City - given the FBI does nothing but cause violence and hate crimes, they are targeting peaceful people and all the informers now known to me are encouraging violence to entrap others. That seems the only rational explanation.

I would caution all white activists to be particularly vigilant in avoiding any discussion of illegal acts, as such discussings [discussions] quickly become conspiracies that carry as much time as the act themselves. The FBI is making a huge push and I do not want to see anyone else caught up in it.

Additionally, I have to apologize to individuals who have pled guilty to federal offenses - like yourself or David Duke. While I did not cooperate or plead guilty in anyway, I also suffered being labeled a "terrorist". I ___interrogation measures and isolation in a maximum security unit for two and a half months. I could have cooperated, made a proffer, and left - I chose not to.

I have retained civil counsel and will be suing for civil rights violations and wrongful imprisonment; damages are in excess of $7.5 million.

Despite reports, my company and family have survived the experience without lasting harm, and I completed a successful reorganization in Chapter II two weeks ago, eliminating about $1 million in debt and retaining essentially all my property.

Again, I thank you for having written, and please share my comments and warnings with the white community.

Sincerely,

/s/ Bill White" (end of letter)

The latest update on Bill White's legal situation in Roanoke was posted HERE on September 2nd.

I have found no official corroboration of this claim. A Google search of the term "Operation Hopeful Eagle" returned no specific information. While I tend to discount conspiracy theories such as the claim that the 1969 moon landings were fake, or that the WTC towers were brought down by "jet fuel", Bill White, despite pushing the envelope and some of his previous provocative tactics, retains some credibility. He has never peddled tall tales about embedding dynamite in earthquake faults or tossing bodies off the Continental Shelf, as Hal Turner did.

Ironically, Hal Turner may have inadvertently corroborated White's claim about the FBI. In an August 31st letter posted on FamilyOfHalTurner, Turner claims he was an operative of both the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) and another group which he described as "a group of supervisory people who were higher up in the FBI", who wanted Hal to be an “intelligence operative”. The special FBI cell didn't want the JTTF knowing about its existence or activities. There is no indication that Hal Turner interacted with Bill White while both were incarcerated in Chicago, so collusion between the two on this story is unlikely.

Is this "special FBI cell" the driving force behind this Operation Hopeful Eagle?

These revelations now cause me to re-visit the trial and conviction of Shaun Walker, Travis Massey, and Eric Egbert (Walker was the one the Feds really wanted, and they were hoping that Massey and Egbert would shop Walker). Why were the Feds so determined to go after Walker, in particular. If the Feds were telling the truth about the so-called "bar fights", Walker, Massey, and Egbert would have been prosecuted by the State of Utah for assault. The failure of Utah to prosecute them on state charges implies no crime could be proved. Yet the Feds squandered taxpayer dollars prosecuting them on bogus "civil rights" charges and used two snitches to hornswoggle an all-white jury to convict. This begs the question: Why were the Feds so determined to get Shaun Walker out of the way?

I think we're now uncovering the answer.

Eric Egbert's Sentence Reduced To 33 Months To Match Reductions Given To Shaun Walker And Travis Massey In Utah

On July 22nd, 2009, in response to a 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling ordering a review of sentencing, U.S. District Judge Dee Benson re-sentenced Shaun Walker (originally 87 months) and Travis Massey (originally 57 months) to shorter terms of 37 months and 30 months, respectively. Since Eric Egbert was not covered by the 10th Circuit ruling, his original term of 42 months remained in effect, although he was considered to be the least culpable. In response, Egbert filed a motion to get his sentenced reduced.

And on Tuesday September 2nd, 2009, Judge Dee Benson did just that. Judge Benson ordered that Egbert's term be reduced to 33 months. This means Egbert's estimated release date would be in the Dec-Jan time frame. Federal prosecutors did not oppose the sentence reduction. Full story from the Salt Lake Tribune.

Egbert, along with Shaun Walker and Travis Massey, were convicted in April 2007 of conspiracy to interfere with civil rights and interference with a federally protected activity. All were members of the National Alliance at the time; Walker also became the Chairman of the organization, while Massey was the Salt Lake City Unit Coordinator. The charges stemmed from the alleged attacks upon two non-White men at Salt Lake City bars. The three were accused of assaulting a Mexican-American bartender on December 31st, 2002, at O'Shucks, and Massey and another man were accused of attacking an American Indian man at the now-defunct Port O'Call on March 15th, 2003. But the bulk of the case revolved around the testimony of two snitches; Keith Cotter, who sang like a canary to get leniency for another crime, and Brad Callahan, who may have been threatened with prosecution for an undisclosed crime. Both minimized their own roles in the crime and maximized the roles of the accused. Unfortunately, the all-white jury bought the snitches' stories.

Both Walker and Massey appealed their sentences, and on April 14th, 2009, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver ruled that the two must be re-sentenced. The appeals court said there was insufficient evidence supporting a factor considered in setting their punishment: that a victim in a beating suffered "serious bodily injury as opposed to bodily injury." The Port O'Call victim was never found and the eyewitness testimony was not enough to show he would have required medical treatment. In addition, the court also reversed a finding that Walker was a leader in the group, saying the case record did not show he exercised any more authority than any of the other members.

Click HERE to review all previous posts discussing the indictment phase.
Click HERE to review all previous posts discussing the trial phase.
Click HERE for previous post about Keith Cotter.
Click HERE for Voice Of Deseret post about Brad Callahan.

You can also read Shaun Walker's own account of the incidents and the trial HERE. It should also be noted that the State of Utah never preferred any charges against these three individuals; if it happened the way the Feds claim it did, it would meet Utah's definition of an assault. Walker, Massey, and Egbert were railroaded by the Feds, yet all three have remained true to their ideals and have refused to roll over. All have long since severed formal ties with the National Alliance, such action being required as a condition of bail back during the indictment phase.

Racially-Conscious White Man Fired From Job For Distributing Pro-White Literature At Work, Even Though Some Co-Workers Asked For The Literature

On this Stormfront thread, an individual identified as Leland Oswald discloses that a 50-year-old racially conscious White man was fired from his job for distributing pro-White literature on the job. The man was terminated despite the fact that he did not initiate a cold distribution, but provided the literature only after some of his co-workers requested it because they knew of his reputation as being pro-White. Neither the location nor the company name were provided, but the account is still useful nonetheless because of the lessons learned which it provides. Here are the pertinent posts from the thread.

Here's Oswald's first post:

I hope this is in the right place. If not I apologize and please move. My brother was fired this morning for "handing out unapproved literature". He had given a few of his co-workers some stickers and pamphlets from Tightrope and The National Alliance. The reason his boss said they were terminating his employment was that the company was afraid of being sued. I wonder if it was a muslim, ACORN, or La Raza supporter passing out propaganda if it would be an incident wothy of a loss of income in this poor economy. Whatever happenned to freedom of speech and freedom of association?

The boss said they had gotten complaints, but nothing was ever said to him, no progressive discipline at all. They are now hiring 2 mestizo's and a mixed breed mud to work there. For those here of faith, I would ask that you please keep him and his daughter in your prayers. He's been concerned because his daughter just started as a freshman in college, and he went through a divorce just earlier this year, so the money's terribly tight. The job only paid 8 bucks an hour, and it was a backbreaker. I told him that The Good Lord has something better for him just up the road. He's over 50, so he'll need all the help he can get. God bless you all.

Here's Oswald's second post, which clarifies some undefined issues from the first post:

I'm sorry if I misled folks. He didn't interject his point of view, but he didn't hide it out of fear. It was his co-workers who had asked him for the literature and stickers. When the boss found out, he fired him. I also forgot to mention that every morning, the whole shop prays for at least five minutes before starting work. There isn't any problem with that, though. I support the concept of prayer in the workplace, but you can't have it both ways, or can you? If he was handing out pro gay marriage material, he'd be protected. I understand the need to keep things separate, but where was the warning to cut it out? There was none. He is a proud White man, and will be till he dies, just like me. It's sickening to me to see a man have to cower to keep his job. Never been much good at boot licking. Thanks for the input from you all.

Analysis: This sounds like an "at-will employer". An "at-will employer" can terminate you for any reason at any time, without notice and without severance pay. The only caveat is you cannot tell the employee you're firing him because he's a member of a "protected class", then the employer bumps up against civil rights statutes. You can still qualify for unemployment compensation in most cases. One person speculates that an anti-racist may have deliberately asked the man for pro-White literature on the job to set him up for the termination. One other possibility is that the employer unofficially fired him because he was "too old" (50 years old) and used the literature pretext as an excuse to dump him in favor of younger workers. In an "at-will" environment, an employer can get away with it as long as he doesn't publicly say he's firing the guy because of his age.

Lessons Learned: Do not bring pro-White literature into your workplace at any time for any reason. If an employee asks you for literature, wait until you're off company property AND off the clock before giving him the literature. I will add one more caveat; don't access any pro-White websites on the company computers, and this caveat could even apply if you bring your own laptop in to work, but slave off the company's Wi-Fi network. Of course, this will not guarantee absolute protection; former National Alliance member Dan Schildhauer got fired from Cabela's in Nebraska in 2003 for distributing pro-White literature off the job on his own time, but Schildhauer had also attracted the notice of a vengeful Hispanic cop, who blew the whistle on him to Cabela's. But keeping your pro-White activism off the job will better protect you against arbitrary termination.

National Socialist Activist Bill White Back In Roanoke To Face More Federal Charges, Bond Hearing September 10th, Free Speech Defense Anticipated

On September 2nd, 2009, the Roanoke Times reports that national socialist activist Bill White, who is still officially the commander of the dormant American National Socialist Workers Party (ANSWP), has finally returned to Roanoke and is preparing to face another battery of Federal charges stemming from his prior activism. A short report has also been published by WDBJ Channel 7.

During a brief hearing on Tuesday September 1st in U.S. District Court in Roanoke, Magistrate Judge Michael Urbanski told White, who has been locked up since October 2008, that he is entitled to another bond hearing, despite the fact that the same Urbanski originally denied him bond last year prior to the Chicago case. This does not necessarily signal the Urbanski might reach a different decision on bond this time, but does reflect the fact that this is a different case, and that Urbanski might favorably consider the fact that the Chicago charges were quashed. There is a chance Bill White might be granted bail - but he might have to agree to a series of onerous restrictions like the ones originally proposed for Hal Turner in that case. In particular, White might be asked to stay off the Internet and even agree not to have access to a personal computer in exchange for bail.

In the Chicago case, Bill White was originally charged with solicitation for posting online the name, address and telephone number of the Jewish foreman of a Chicago jury that railroaded Matt Hale. But on July 21st, a federal judge rejected the government's theory that White solicited violence against the juror, ruling his actions were protected by the First Amendment. Roanoke attorneys David Damico and Ray Ferris, who have yet to be officially hired by White but appeared in court Tuesday on his behalf, said after the hearing that they would consider a free-speech defense to the charges similar to the one that was used successfully in Chicago. Update: On September 4th, WDBJ reports that the two lawyers now have been officially hired by White.

But complicating the issue in Roanoke is the fact that Bill White actually faces many more charges, and that there is more than one "victim". Among White's targets were the so-called "civil rights attorney" Richard Warman in Canada, the nationally syndicated black newspaper columnist Leonard "Cry Me A River" Pitts, and an obscure small-town black mayor in New Jersey. Specifically, he was charged with five counts of communicating threats in interstate commerce, one count of communicating an extortionate threat in interstate commerce, and one count of witness intimidation.

If found guilty of communicating threats in interstate commerce, White could face a maximum punishment of five years in prison for each count of the indictment. If found guilty of communicating extortionate threats in interstate commerce, White could face a maximum punishment of 20 years in prison. If found guilty of witness intimidation, White faces a maximum punishment of ten years in prison. Each of the aforementioned charges also entails a potential fine of up to $250,000.

The 19-page Roanoke indictment can be read HERE (loads slowly).

Bill White's financial posture appears to be more favorable than it once was. According to this post on this VNN Forum thread, his Chapter 11 cleared in late July with the release of about $1 million in debt, without any substantial loss of rental income. He states that his estate continues to generate $17,000 - $18,000 per month of income, his debt payments are down in the $7,500 range, and for the first time in nine months he is positioned to return to buying property. Visit the FreeBillWhite website for more information on this case.

Glenn Miller Posts Letter From POW Matt Hale On The Vanguard News Network Forum; All Restrictions On Hale's Correspondence Have Been Lifted

Great news! Glenn Miller has received a letter from longtime POW Matt Hale, who announces that the strict regime which he's endured at USP Florence ADMAX in Colorado has been modified. After three and a half years, Hale can now receive mail on the same basis as other prisoners.

Here's the letter, cross-posted from this VNN Forum thread:

Tuesday, August 25, 36AC (2009)

Dear Brother Glenn;

I am pleased to inform you that finally after 3 and 1/2 years of being banned from having correspondence with anyone who is not immediate family, and 5 years of being banned from having correspondence with your specifically, all of the restrictions upon my mail have been lifted and we are free to correspond with one another again as we desire. This letter leaves me in good health and spirits with a strong pending case for habeas corpus.

I am in the "Alcatraz of the Rockies" now but the place isn't so bad now that I have the same rights as other prisoners. My mailing address is on the envelope.

The infamous "SAMs" have finally been removed so you no longer need to have any concern for falling afoul of the myriad of restrictions as in the past and as led to our being banned from writing each other.

How are you and your family? I suppose Anna (who had a liking for my looks I recall) has gotten herself hitched by now? I hope you are still at this address.

Find enclosed one of my poems. Hopefully, you can read it okay (I should be getting it typed up in the near future). If you can't let me know. I have also written a song for the entire pro-white movement. Remind me to send the lyrics to you when you write me back and let me know if you happen to read sheet music. It is quite a tune !

I look forward to hearing from you soon, my friend! Never count me out!

For our folk!

Matt

"Perseverance and spirit have done wonders in all ages" - George Washington

P.S. Have you read The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government by Jefferson David? A great book! (I read it last year) END OF LETTER

Matt's poem, entitled "A Blow Received"

"I have no regrets for my chosen path,
Though I have incurred a vengeful wrath,
In my cell I ponder yea,
When I return, a glorious day

To rejoin my comrades, gleam in eye,
After having defeated this horrible lie,
Returning to my rightful place,
In the struggle to save our beloved race

And the day will come when it will be said,
And in the books of our children it will be read,
That yes this persecution will have proved a blow,
But not to us, rather to our foe."

Send letters and parcels to Matt Hale at the following prison address (Miller advises us not to include racist or anti-semitic language or material in our letters as it may adversely impact his court appeal, or the prison authorities might not even give him the letter). If you send a parcel via a carrier other than the U.S. Postal Service, ask them if they deliver to Florence ADMAX first; see further instructions HERE.

Matthew F. Hale
Reg. No. 15177-424
U.S. Penitentiary Max
PO Box 8500,
Florence, CO 81226-8500

Here's the address where you can send Matt Hale a money order for his canteen/commissary account:

Federal Bureau of Prisons
(Matthew F. Hale #15177-424)
PO Box 474701
Des Moines, IA 50947

While Wikipedia has an entry on Matt Hale, I suggest you read Edgar Steele's posts about the case to cut through the ZOG spin. In March 2004, he wrote "Trial By Media", and in March 2005, he wrote a second column, which has a more detailed analysis of the case. Hale was clearly railroaded. Sentenced to 40 years for soliciting the murder of Judge Joan Lefkow, he's not scheduled for release until December 6, 2037.