Austin, Minnesota Mayor Tom Stiehm Rebuffs NSM-Authored Illegal Immigration Enforcement Petition Because He's Scared Of Working With "Neo-Nazis"

On Monday August 3rd, 2009, an act of political cowardice was committed in Austin, Minnesota. The mayor and city council refused to sign a petition calling for more vigorous enforcement of illegal immigration laws, because they were afraid of making common cause with "neo-Nazis".

The Austin Post-Bulletin reports that Samuel Johnson, who's the leader of the National Socialist Movement's Southeast Minnesota Unit, and who's organized anti-immigration rallies in the past, most recently on July 11th, showed up at the city council meeting and asked the mayor and city council members to sign a petition demanding the local sheriff enter into an agreement with federal authorities to enforce immigration laws. This has also been posted on the NSM national website and on the official NSM blog.

Reading from the petition, Johnson said, "We demand that the Mower County Sheriff's Department enter into a memorandum agreement with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to enforce immigration laws... .I was just wondering if anyone here would like to be the first to (sign the petition)".

In response, Austin Mayor Tom Stiehm said, "If anyone wants to sign it, speak up. I certainly don't want to sign it". When Johnson asked why he wasn't going to sign the petition about illegal aliens, Stiehm interrupted, saying "This isn't a forum for that. If you want to say something, make your statement and then sit down, but we aren't having a forum."

Not intimidated in the least, Johnson fired back, "This isn't a forum. This is a petition for the city of Austin and the gang problem that is increasingly going on, and you can't deny that anymore. I think this is a clear issue here in the city and it needs to be taken care of now instead of hiding behind the city council and other local agencies." Afterwards, Johnson immediately left the meeting.

After the meeting, Mayor Stiehm showed his true colors and gave the real reason why he rebuffed the petition. "The reason I don't support him is because that guy is a Nazi," Stiehm said. "We fought a war against the Nazis, and I am sure as heck not going to support anything they do." But perhaps Stiehm doesn't see a problem yet because Austin is still 90 percent White; Whites who live in mostly-white communities tend to be more enthusiastic about diversity than those who live in multicultural areas.

While Stiehm's statement represents political cowardice, showing he's more afraid of "neo-Nazis" than he is of illegal immigrants, it also represents one of the biggest stumbling blocks to national socialist activists nationwide. Too many World War II veterans fought against the Germans, and as a result, too many Americans believe that supporting NSM activism is a betrayal of these veterans, even though Germany never attacked the American homeland. As long as national socialist activists understand this limitation and are prepared to account for it, more power to them. Besides, the mayor probably would have rejected the petition even if it had been proffered by the Nationalist Coalition or European Americans United.

Anyone who doesn't like the NSM being involved in this issue in Austin is welcome to step up to the plate and take the initiative themselves.

The voters of Austin, Minnesota would do well to remember that their elected officials were offered an opportunity to take a firmer stand against the illegal aliens in their community and refused to do so when the next election rolls around. Mayor Stiehm has compromised his political integrity by refusing to promote more vigorous enforcement of immigration laws. He has failed in his primary mission - to protect the community.

As for the cops themselves, they're not unwilling. The real problem, according to Mower County Sheriff Terese Amazi, is lack of funding. Amazi said the sheriff's department has neither the manpower nor the budget to send deputies to the two-month, out-of-state training session, which is needed in order to work with ICE officials. "I have looked into this issue," she said. "What the program does is it gives our deputies the ability to work with ICE officials, it doesn't give them independent status. If they want to give me the funding, then sure. But even with that said, they still have to work with ICE officials. We cannot enforce federal laws." So it appears that Amazi does at least recognize there is an illegal immigrant problem.

According to OJJPAC, Minnesota has three sanctuary cities for illegals; Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Worthington. OJJPAC classifies cities with both active and passive sanctuary policies as sanctuary cities.

Supreme Court Nominee Sonia Sotomayor Receives The Kosher Seal Of Approval; All 13 Jews In U.S. Senate Vote For Her Confirmation

It's understandable why Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor is the darling of the professional Hispanic lobbies. After all, she's one of their own, reflecting much of their racialist agenda. The National Council of La Raza is in full-scale "fiesta" mode over the vote, as is the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF).

And actually, many within the White racialist community would not particularly begrudge the Hispanic community celebrating this event. After all, we White racialists would also celebrate if Dr. David Duke had been confirmed to the Supreme Court. The only difference...while the political elite which governs America deems Hispanic pride to be "cool", they've decided that White pride is "uncool". And they've used academia to develop a secular theology which demonizes and disenfranchises Whites, redefining racism to imply that only Whites can be guilty of it, and promoting bogus doctrines of "white privilege" and prescribing the ritualization of "white guilt".

But did you know that another racial/ethnic lobby voted for Sotomayor WITHOUT exception? That's right; the entire 13-member Senate Jewish "caucus" voted for her confirmation. Of course, all 13 Jews in the Senate are Democrats or "Independents" who vote with the Democrats as well, and they voted as a block to propel Sotomayor to confirmation by a 68-31-1 vote (Ted Kennedy didn't show up). In contrast, nine of the 40 Republicans joined with the Democrats. Full roll call results HERE.

Here's the list of 13 Jewish senators, originally posted HERE back in January 2009. All voted to confirm Sotomayor:

-- Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
-- Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
-- Joseph Lieberman (I-CT)
-- Benjamin L. Cardin (D-MD)
-- Carl Levin (D-MI)
-- Al Franken (D-MN)
-- Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
-- Charles Schumer (D-NY)
-- Ron Wyden (D-OR)
-- Arlen Specter (D-PA)
-- Bernard Sanders (I-VT)
-- Russ Feingold (D-WI)
-- Herb Kohl (D-WI)

It's also interesting to note that Al Franken actually presided over the debate and the final vote in the U.S. Senate. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) also got in their two shekels worth, issuing a press release congratulating Sotomayor on her confirmation. I wonder if they would have reacted the same way if Dr. David Duke had been the nominee? Not a chance!

It should also be noted that the "Jewish" agenda would not progress as readily without the help of the numerous white shabbos goyim in the Senate. Subtract 13 from 68, and you still get 51 votes, which would have been enough to confirm Sotomayor. Whites in positions of power who voluntarily advance the Jewish agenda need to be held just as accountable as the Jews themselves.

But are Jews as solicitious of Black and Hispanic concerns privately as they appear to be publicly? This video taken by Max Blumenthal in Tel Aviv in June 2009 would tend to portray a different picture:



White nationalist reaction is documented on this Stormfront thread and the Vanguard News Network Forum.

Obnoxious Hasidic Jew NYPD Cop Joel Witriol Roughs Up Chrissie Brodigan, Accuses Her Of Anti-Semitism, Cites Her For Not Having Sick Dog In Carrier

A gaggle of New York's finest mob and swarm a woman and her dog

Hasidic Jews can be some of the most insular, mouthy, and generally obnoxious people in the New York City area. And the New York Police Department's first Hasidic Jew cop seems to fit that mold to a T.

The confrontation occurred on Monday June 29th, 2009, but I just learned of it today on the Vanguard News Network Forum, and was outraged enough to post it. According to WABC Channel 7, Chrissie Brodigan had removed her pug dog Dempsey from its carrying case after exiting the subway at the Beford Avenue station in Williamsburg because he had thrown up inside it (probably from smelling too many Negroes). Anyway, a NYPD officer spotted her and attempted to cite her for not having the dog in its carrying case.

But it wasn't just any cop - it was the NYPD's first Hasidic Jewish cop, Joel Witriol, replete with yarmulke. Hasidic Jews are known to have very sexist attitudes towards their women; it's not uncommon in Israel for a woman to marry a Hasidic or other Orthodox Jew, then spend her whole life working to support both of them so he can study Torah all the time. In any event, Witriol allegedly began making sexist remarks towards Brodigan, telling her, "If you're going to act like a woman, I'm going to treat you like a woman." The discussion became heated, and Witriol used force against Brodigan, kicking her, grabbing her breasts, and punching her in the back to subdue her. Moments later, Brodigan was in cuffs up against the wall. When interviewed by the media, Brodigan showed bruises on her leg, her arm and her wrist.

At the ensuing press conference, NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly said, "There's no indication of that. And if the complainant says she was, and that will be investigated by the civilian complaint review board." But an eyewitness took pictures of the confrontation and corroborated Brodigan's story, and called the officer's actions excessive and unprofessional. The witness said Brodigan never uttered anti-Semitic remarks, in response to a claim made after the fact by the officer.

Brodigan admits she got a bit mouthy with the cop, but strongly denied making any anti-Semitic remarks, and said the officer was way out of line and should pick up some additional training on how to deal with people. Ultimately, she got three citations - one for failure to provide identification, another for failure to have dog in a container, and a third for disorderly conduct. Podblanc video of WABC report embedded below:



But this story then took an ugly turn. On July 9th, the Gothamist reported that Chrissie Brodigan lost her job at Plum TV over the incident. Two days after Brodigan's arrest, the New York Post, a notorious NYPD mouthpiece, published a hatchet job on Brodigan in which they claimed they found a mysterious "witness", subsequently identified as Viane Delgado, who said that Brodigan had told the Hasidic cop, "You fucking Jew, you're not even human. Jewish people think they own everything." It is unknown whether or not this allegation was included in the police report, but it is at variance with witness statements to the contrary. WPIX Channel 11 also picked up this story.

Nevertheless, Plum TV used Delgado's charge as an excuse to terminate Brodigan for alleged "dishonesty". According to Brodigan: "I was terminated for "equivocating" in the press. My boss [Chris Glowacki] is threatening to not offer an agreeable severance package, including health insurance, which is crucial because I have cystic fibrosis and he is aware. He's angry that this is out in the press. I think he made a judgment based on perceived bigotry."

But on July 29th, the Gothamist reported that things took a slight turn for the better. During a hearing at the MTA's Transit Adjudication Bureau, Hearing Officer Alexander Fox ruled that two of the citations — one for failure to provide identification and another for failure to have dog in a container — were invalid because they had been "materially altered" by Officer Joel Witriol, who was absent from the hearing. Copies of the tickets given to Brodigan list 3:51 p.m. as the time the citations were issued, but official copies turned in by Officer Witriol to the Bureau showed the time was crossed out and changed to 4:51 p.m. Such after-the-fact alterations can automatically invalidate a ticket.

Perhaps that was Witriol's way of "apologizing" for his conduct. By altering the tickets, he was throwing the case. But Brodigan doesn't agree, although she doesn't think Witriol altered the citations by accident, either. "It is hard for me to believe that Officer Witriol did not realize that by altering my citations after he gave them to me that he was essentially invalidating all of them", said Brodigan. She has filed a complaint against the officer with the NYPD's Civilian Complaint Review Board, which may consider the invalid tickets during its investigation of misconduct. The third charge against Brodigan for disorderly conduct is still pending and will be heard in criminal court in late August.

Connecticut Case Of Federal Political Prisoner Hal Turner Continued Until August 18th; Turner Still Being Held Without Bail

On August 4th, 2009, the Hartford Courant reports that the Connecticut case of Federal political prisoner Hal Turner has been continued until August 18th. Because the Feds are holding him without bail, Turner did not show up for his scheduled state hearing.

"Mr. Turner is a guest of the federal government," Assistant State's Attorney Dennis O'Connor told Judge Julia Dewey. As a result, Judge Dewey continued Turner's case to August 18th, when a judge will consider a request by Turner's New Jersey attorney, Michael A. Orozczo, to represent him in the Connecticut case.

Yes, Hal Turner is a self-confessed snitch, but he's also a legitimate political prisoner as well. In addition, there is no evidence that any White activists have been arrested and prosecuted as a result of Turner's relationship with the Feds, although I remain suspicious of the fact that Turner suddenly bolted to Brazil less than 24 hours before Bill White was first arrested back in October 2008. Turner was highly critical of White at the time.

Here are the upcoming legal milestones to be faced by Hal Turner:

-- August 10th: Continuation of bail hearing in Federal case in Chicago. Turner has been requested to produce the person who he claims was his FBI contact.
-- August 18th: Next hearing in the Connecticut state case.
-- October 5th: Projected start date for the Federal trial in Chicago.

The court documents for the Federal case can be viewed HERE. Information about the Connecticut state charges HERE.

Both the FreeHalTurner blog and the FamilyOfHalTurner blog keep the public informed about Hal Turner's case and personal welfare. Turner is currently being held at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Chicago. He is still in protective custody, unable to see anyone but his attorneys. He is allowed one social phone call a month, and may call his attorneys only at specific times. His blood pressure is reportedly still elevated, but he is now receiving medication for it. It was previously reported that the "caps were removed from his teeth" because they could conceivably be used as a "weapon".

Turner's admission of being an informant has cost him dearly within the White Nationalist community. Before the announcement, he had collected $1,370 in donations. His donation widget currently shows $1,380. Thus he has collected only $10 in donations since the announcement.

Nevertheless, there is no reason why people can't send Hal Turner a letter of support, showing that we still recognize that he is a political prisoner. Turner's wife provides the following instructions for those who wish to write to Hal. First, place the letter inside an envelope, but leave the envelope unaddressed. Then place the envelope inside a second envelope, and address it as follows:

P. Turner
1906 Paterson Plank Rd.
North Bergen, NJ 07047

Assume in advance that every piece of mail addressed to Turner will be opened and read.

Freedom14 Shifts Focus To Newport Beach, California; Distributes Pro-White Brochures Face To Face To The White Public, Get A Positive Reaction

Freedom14 activists spread the word in Newport Beach

Freedom14 is certainly not resting on its laurels. Their confrontation with bandannaed anti-racists in Huntington Beach on July 18th, 2009, as well as another successful confrontation with anti-racists on July 25th which sent the embarrassed and humiliated antis scampering home with their tails between their legs, merely whetted their appetite for further activism.

And on Saturday August 1st, they were back at it again, this time just down the Pacific Coast Highway in Newport Beach. As described on their website, they formed up down at the Newport Pier and distributed several hundred trifold brochures focusing upon the non-quantifiable effects of illegal immigration. They kept partial track of the reaction, and reported that only two out of 100 people rejected the flyers. A number of recipients actually responded with a smile, a sincere “thank you”, or a handshake. Many immediately turned to the back of the pamphlet for a quick summary about the group and its message, and some returned to engage the activists in further discussion.

Some of the participating Freedom14 activists also opened a discussion on this Stormfront thread, since they're eager not only to report on their activism, but also to solicit constructive input from other White activists who've had experience. One thing of note - they generally don't waste time giving flyers to those who are obviously non-White, preferring to concentrate only upon people who obviously appear White. Giving pro-White literature to non-Whites is just as much a waste of time as trying to post our message on a Jewish or Black discussion board - it just pisses them off.

Alas, the more personal one-on-one approach employed by Freedom14 has not attracted any media publicity yet. The last media coverage of Freedom14 I saw was a hit piece posted July 23rd on a blog in the Orange County Weekly, a typical hippie newspaper better used for cat litter or birdcage liner. Registration not required to post comments, by the way. But while media coverage is helpful to the Cause, getting our message out through one-on-one action can actually have more lasting value. Besides, the growing White media is not without reach.

American Pro-White Videographer Craig Cobb Rejected For Asylum In Finland, Threatened With Expulsion From Estonia; Podblanc Will Be Unaffected

Update August 4th: Craig Cobb discloses that he received a 2 and 1/2 hour trial in Estonia where they concluded that he endangered public security, public order, public safety, moral standards, health of other persons or some other relevent public interests, rejecting his application for asylum in Estonia and expelling him from the country. However, he has not yet been physically removed from the country; he's locked down in jail until September 16th. He has cash and an American passport.


During June 2009, I first heard shadowy reports about longtime pro-White videographer Craig Cobb, who was seemingly living in Estonia without any official government harassment, suddenly applying for political asylum in Finland. However, coherent reports weren't available at the time, and so I could not run with the story.

This has changed. We now have more details available, and so I have enough to publish a post on this situation. Primary references for this post include this VNN Forum thread and this post on Podblanc.

Craig Cobb is a longtime pro-White activist. His activities range from showing up at different pro-White rallies like the October 2005 Kingston, NY rally for Robbie Hedrick to distributing pro-White literature wherever and whenever appropriate. Seeing the potential for a video outreach, he soon branched out into serious video activism and formed the Podblanc video hosting site where politically-incorrect videos can be hosted without fear of removal. Three years ago, Cobb re-located to Estonia, not only because it is a Whiter nation, but to escape growing suppression of the pro-White movement in America.

And all appeared to be well - until 2009. Apparently the Estonian authorities started harassing Cobb over his pro-White activism, because on June 2nd, he traveled to Finland and requested political asylum. Cobb claimed asylum protection based upon four principles; religion (WCOTC/Creativity), race (indigenous White), membership in social groups (White Nationalists), and political opinion (free speech).

On the Podblanc post, Cobb relates some interesting anecdotes about his sojourn in Helsinki, Finland. He notes that, although Finland remains overwhelmingly White, there are visible signs of growing non-white infestation in Helsinki itself. You'd be surprised at the variety of subhuman detritus also seeking asylum in Finland; they include Iraqis, Kurds, Gypsies, Nigerians, Sudanese, Somalis, Gambians, Congolese, and even Albanians (who stole Kosovo from the Serbs). In addition, Cobb also witnessed young Finnish whites in the streets trying to get Finns to "tithe their incomes to UNICEF non-White spawn". He also refers to an appalling cultural event called "Miss Africa-Finland".

Particularly noteworthy was Cobb's encounter with a Gypsy. In this instance, Cobb was nearly attacked by a 15 or 16 year old gypsy at the train station as he held his open Macbook and recorded. He baited Cobb by accusing him of stealing the computer. Being that the Gypsy was just a punk, Cobb said, “Yeah, I just stole it and they are floowling me right now”. At this, the Gypsy reportedly told Cobb “You stole my friends computer!”, and repeatedly physically threatened him with this age-old shit gypsy ruse. Cobb had to push the Gypsy back by his neck at one point and ask him a number of times if he understood that if he (Cobb) cut his jugular, he would have two and a half minutes to live, and if he thought the ambulance could possibly arrive in less than two and a half minutes. Things simmered down shortly thereafter. But many Eastern European patriots consider Gypsies to be malodorous, conniving, manipulative subhuman scum, and having observed them for myself during my military service in the U.K. from 1983-7, I can vouch for that.

However, Cobb only had to put up with multi-culti Helsinki for 14 days, for it was at that point that Finland rejected Cobb's application for political asylum, and deported him back to Estonia, where he immediately applied for asylum. Initially, conditions looked promising, as the Estonian authorities seemed attentive to the political threats faced by pro-White activists, particularly when Cobb told them about the harassment by the SPLC and ADL. However, Cobb has since disclosed that Estonia has rejected his asylum application and jailed him. They called him racist, and said there is now a ten-year ban on him in Estonia retroactive to February 2007. They also said in court that Sweden had some trial in absentia against him. It looks like Cobb has done two YouTube videos discussing this and other issues; they are embedded below:

June 26th video, Part 1 of 2:




June 26th video, Part 2 of 2:



Note that these videos were made on June 26th, long before Hal Turner admitted he was an FBI informant. It is not known whether Cobb's favorable attitude towards Turner has been affected by the disclosure.

However, Cobb has dual citizenship and he believes he will be deported to Canada rather than the USA. Estonian law allows one to choose if one has rights to more than one country. Cobb gives four reasons why he leans towards Canada:

(1). By verbal agreement with the Podblanc cell, his partial ownership in Podblanc is forfeited when he is one second outside Canadian air space and about to enter Canada. This means Podblanc can survive any measures taken against Craig Cobb.

(2). Canadians need help with their Hasbara hate laws

(3). Any Canadian thought or speech crimes committed by Cobb were outside Canadian territory.

(4). He can more rapidly earn money to go to South America or Serbia or Belarus – or any other country more favorably disposed towards free speech and pro-White activism.

The Podblanc video embedded below provides some more background:



Also visit Craig Cobb's YouTube Deprogram Channel for more of his videos. Even though YouTube is unfriendly towards pro-White videos, that will not stop a proven activist like Cobb from attempting to use it.