Wednesday, June 03, 2009

White Nationalist Radio Host Hal Turner Arrested In New Jersey On Connecticut Warrant For Publishing "Harassing Communications" On His Blog

Note: All posts about Hal Turner's arrest can be read HERE, with the most recent post appearing first.

Upon visiting Hal Turner's Turner Radio Network blog on June 3rd, 2009, I discovered a post in which Hal Turner reported himself arrested on a Connecticut warrant for publishing "harassing communications". Because Turner has posted hoary stories about burying bodies in the continental shelf and planting dynamite in earthquake faults in Peru, I decided to ignore it until I got independent substantiation.

Unfortunately, that independent substantiation has now been published in the Hartford Courant. The Courant reports that State Capitol police obtained an arrest warrant for radio host Hal Turner on June 3rd for inciting readers of his blog to "take up arms" against two Connecticut lawmakers and an official with the Office of State Ethics. Last week, he published a post that promised to release the home addresses of State Rep. Michael Lawlor, State Sen. Andrew McDonald and Thomas Jones of the ethics office.

"Mr. Turner's comments are above and beyond the threshold of free speech", Capitol Police Chief Michael J. Fallon said in an e-mail announcing the warrant. "He is inciting others through his website to commit acts of violence and has created fear and alarm. He should be held accountable for his conduct".

The story has also been picked up by the Connecticut Post, WTIC 1080AM and WWLP Channel 22. Discussion on the Vanguard News Network Forum and Stormfront.

The post in question, entitled "State Restricts Catholics From Politics", was published on June 2nd, 2009. Turner believes a bill being considered by the Connecticut State Legislature could force the Roman Catholic Church to change itself internally and allow another state agency to force the church to register as a lobbying group. The bill, which Turner identifies as SB1098, is proposed by the co-chairmen of the Legislature's Judiciary Committee, Rep. Michael Lawlor (D-East Haven), and Sen. Andrew McDonald (D-Stamford), would reorganize the internal structure of local parishes to remove priests and bishops from financial oversight to replace them with boards of laypeople. Adding insult to injury is the fact that both Lawlor and McDonald are adamant advocates of same-sex marriage legislation and appear to be trying to legislatively punish the church for standing against their agenda.

Turner goes on to say that when the Archbishop of Bridgeport found out about this effort, he wrote about it on his blog and shortly thereafter, Catholics began exercising their right to petition representatives for redress of this grievance. As a result, six weeks ago, 4,000 Catholics arrived at the State House to protest the Bill and that's when things got worse. The state of Connecticut didn't like having such a protest turnout, so they got another agency of government, the Office of State Ethics (OSE), to open an investigation of the church. The Diocese of Bridgeport received a letter from OSE informing it that an investigation was underway to ascertain if the diocese had violated state law by failing to register as a lobbyist organization. This is an act of bureaucratic terrorism by the state as far as I'm concerned.

Further research reveals that the impetus behind the bill is an apostate Catholic organization called "Voice of the Faithful", who want to accomplish a lay takeover of the local Catholic hierarchy under the guise of SB1098. But veteran Rep. Christopher L. Caruso (D-Bridgeport), a Catholic who has made ethics reforms a key portion of his legislative agenda, said Wednesday it's clear that the Bridgeport Diocese should have registered as a lobbyist for the March 11th event under dispute, since Bishop William E. Lori set up the bus caravans from southwestern Connecticut. "The law is the law and if an organization expends more than $2,000 then it must register as a lobbyist," Caruso said in an interview. Caruso also explained that the law was created to provide full public disclosure on how money is being spent to lobby the Legislature. He said the bishop took it upon himself to spend diocesan money and it's simply a matter of filing a disclosure.

Here's the pertinent part of Turner's post from the TRN blog, in case for some reason the post is taken down in the future:


This is a direct government assault upon the Catholic Church, in absolute violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution for the United States.

It is very clear to us at the Turner Radio Network that the state of Connecticut has become tyrannical and abusive. It is actively and aggressively attempting to directly interfere with the internal governance of a church and the free exercise of religion. It is retaliating against citizens for exercising their right to petition for redress of grievances. This is tyranny and it must be put down.

While filing a lawsuit is quaint and the "decent" way to handle things, we at TRN believe that being decent to a group of tyrannical scumbags is the wrong approach. It's too soft.

Thankfully, the Founding Fathers gave us the tools necessary to resolve tyranny: The Second Amendment.

TRN advocates Catholics in Connecticut take up arms and put down this tyranny by force. To that end, THIS WEDNESDAY NIGHT ON "THE HAL TURNER SHOW" we will be releasing the home addresses of the Senator and Assemblyman who introduced SB1098 as well as the home address of Thomas K. Jones from the OSE.

After all, if they are so proud of what they're doing, they shouldn't mind if everyone knows where they live.

It is our intent to foment direct action against these individuals personally. These beastly government officials should be made an example of as a warning to others in government: Obey the Constitution or die.

If any state attorney, police department or court thinks they're going to get uppity with us about this; I suspect we have enough bullets to put them down too.

The state pushed; it is about to get pushed back. Elected and other government officials sometimes need to be put in their place. They serve; they do not rule. They need to learn their place or be put there by force.

Ironically, it was back in October 2008 when Hal Turner celebrated the arrest and incarceration of ANSWP Commander Bill White for similar offenses. Since that time, I've looked upon Turner as little more than a front-running, opportunistic, back-stabbing money-grubbing son-of-a-bitch who is just one step above certified lunatic Martin Lindstedt and confessed murderer Hardy Lloyd.

However, there is one difference between Turner and the other two. Turner has worked productively for the Cause in the past. He led three pro-White rallies in Kingston, Knoxville, and Kalamazoo. His radio show and website in the past provided inspiration to hundreds of White activists. In addition, Turner is a racially-conscious White man being railroaded by the law.

That's why I set my differences with Turner aside at this point and take up for him. While it's far too early to confer "POW" status upon him, it is not too early to let the world know that we've noticed the judicial terrorism being directed at him from Connecticut, and that there is a resistance. How would Connecticut's Capitol Police react if 50 pro-White blogs were to obtain and publish the desired addresses? It could happen.

If the fag-lovers continue their war on people of faith in this country, we will fight back. We will speak out boldly about the evils of faggotry, and no one will silence us.


Anonymous said...

Remember if we go down this path, eventually they will come for YOU when no one is free. Support freedom before it is too late.

What about those who stand in the middle of Times Square NYC each day and with public address systems preach to "Kill Whitey " all day long? No one arrests them, in fact NYC issues them a permit for their daily expressions of brotherly love.

You should be for EQUAL treatment and freedom of ALL opinions, not just the one's that you personally agree with. Otherwise we are all on a very slippery slope to total control by the gov't of everyone's THOUGHTS!

Anonymous said...

Shit, Who didn't see this coming?

Anonymous said...

Gosh I'm so happy. Bill White and Hal turner out of the picture now. Jeff Schoep is next.

Hooch said...

What a loser you are. Happy that the government has decided that our constitutional freedoms will only apply to niggers?

Fuck off you useless bag of shit.

apollonian said...

Bloodthirsty Tyrants Feel Pressure From Brave Patriot, Hal Turner, Who Speaks Powerful Truth
(Apollonian, 4 Jun 09

Yes, I agree AA, Hal Turner had perfect right to make all his statements which were merely eloquent, incisive, and forthright--no wonder state tyrants feel "threatened." So now state (Connecticut) has decided to yet further infringe the citizens' rights on behalf of Jews and queers who are the powers behind present state tyranny.

Note again, state forces don't hesitate to press their tyranny--it costs them relatively little--and result is another dynamic activist, like Hal Turner, is significantly crippled for his freedom. Queers are jumping for joy, no doubt.

What is the crux to all this anti-Christ activity on part of government leviathan?--it is un-questionably the practical power of COUNTERFEITING (see and for expo/ref. on US Federal Reserve Bank fraud) and subsequent "Judeo-Christian" (JC--see and for expo/ref.) activism, JCs, poor fools and dupes of heresy, imagining they will profit fm the ZOG-Mammon empire of lies now pursuing and waging Orwellian "perpetual war for perp. peace," as in Iraq/Afgan.

It's further great travesty and outrage that New Jersey local police found it expedient to cooperate in conspiracy against rights of a citizen in behalf of another state. Make no mistake, such state acts against rights of citizens IS TREASON; heads will roll for all this, indubitably.

But for the moment, what can be done? Observe then the money power continues to rule, but their time is running out as US Dollar approaches imminent collapse. Meantime real Christians must continue to preach and act in that invincible person-to-person manner. Christ was NOT a Jew, and indeed was foremost anti-semite (anti-Talmud, as Gosp. MARK 7:1-13).

CONCLUSION: People know evermore ZOG-Mammon is the real enemy. Hal Turner is heroic leader who is now being persecuted for speaking the truth. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

David Drury said...

Hal Turner and Bill White are not heroes or victims. They are the buffoons that have brought great harm to the pro-White Movement by being ridiculous with their tactics and messages. They don't deserve any pity for misleading true White Patriots and finally getting them discouraged in participating in pro-White politcs.

We should congratulate the SYSTEM for removing these two charlatans from the scene and let the true White leaders (not Jeff Schoep) lead without distraction from those two (three?) assholes.

Anchorage Activist said...

David - you're missing the bigger picture. If the SYSTEM can take them out, it can take US out as well. The system is picking us off one at a time.

apollonian said...

"Drury" Deserves Death--Now Prosecute Me Too
(Apollonian, 4 Jun 09)

AA, u're utterly missing the pt. with this "david drury" piece of shit.

And that pt. very simply is Hal Turner's freedom of speech and the principle of freedom of speech which is grossly and most blatantly violated, which then this stinking scum, "david drury," applauds.

So AA, this punk, "david drury," simply needs to have his stupid little face re-arranged, pure and simple--he's enemy of freedom, rights, law, people--not to mention heroes like Hal Turner and Bill White.

"David drury" is a traitor who gives comfort to the enemy; he's worthy of being killed, pure and simple.

CONCLUSION: Note how I just got finished "inciting violence" against a piece of shit, dearest "dave...," who richly deserves a most brutal death, IN MY OPINION. But the pigs won't prosecute me--myself and davy-dave are too insignificant. Do u see how stupid the charges and case is against Hal Turner? Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

David Drury said...

I know this. Nutcase Bill White and his sidekick Hal Turner have now been removed and it feels good and I know a lot of pro-White people glad of it. Only a few retards would stand up for White and Turner. They broke the law. They are not special. Being a pro-White advocate does not give you the right to "cry fire in the theatre". And all this stupid talk about constitutional rights. BULLSHIT! That's a false shield. Next is Jeff Schoep and his stupid idiots of the Nastional Socialist Movement that make National Socialism look bad. Lastly, if having to surrender some liberties gets rid of these retards then I can live with it. Good thing Benedict Arnold isn't alive and being prosecuted now - you guys would say he is being prosecuted for his constitutional right to express discontent against the Americans fermenting revolution.

Hooch said...

David, why don't you shut your hole asspacker?

Freedom of speech is not conditional.

Apolo, you are next. I know so because my Jew handlers have confirmed this. They are quickly running out of top level people so they now need to move on to the bottom dwellers.

There is no time to clean up your act either since every single page of this and other blogs you post on is saved forever. If the American culture changes over time and they start making anti-Hate laws like in Europe they will come back and lock every single one of us up. No grandfather clause because of the nastiness of the crime of Hate.

Trust me, this is the path that we are headed towards and if you bozos like Drury don't step up to the plate and fight for our constitutional rights, we won't have any in the near future. You will all also need to recognize the enemy which is a much larger group than you think it is. The entire leftist party, not just the Jews that happen to belong to it.

apollonian said...

Jews Now Pretending To Being "More American Than Thou"
(Apollonian, 4 Jun 09)

Now we see "Hooch" Jew jumping into the act, Jews wanting to pretend to "defending" basic rights, thus showing up dedicated anti-semites like mighty Apollonian.

"Hooch" Jew, u're so dumb--how do we know piece-of-shit "drury" isn't just another one of ur Jew stooges?--u have scads of them, with all ur Jew funds.

CONCLUSION: "Hooch" Jew--we don't need u--we got "drury," the dumbass, to compromise himself already with his trashing of rights and US Constitution. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

Hooch said...

Apolo, I was hoping for another death threat because I haven't had one in a while.

Well, on to more interesting things. I found some enlightening information that an anonymous poster left on one of the Anti's sites.

As we know, The radical left is presently holding Bill White as a political prisoner and their objective is to make him the very first person that they were able to crack into our constitution with.

Bill's court case will be a groundbreaking case which will determine if the fringe left have actually given the final blow to our constitution where they will take it apart piece by piece.

Here is the info:

"""Anonymous said...

If speaking in generalities and website postings do not meet the criteria for 'imminent lawless action/likely to incite or produce such action' , 'true threat' and is obvious 'political hyperbole' then at least in HT's case, it would not be enough-unless they are trying to change law. The recurring theme in these cases seems to be looking at whether the danger is imminent* I thought the key was in specificity- but the theme of 'imminence' - proximity, degree- whether the danger is 'clear and present' - Brandenberg , Watts, Evers

Brandenberg and Watts cases, more at links:

Threats of Violence Against Individuals.—The Supreme Court has cited three “reasons why threats of violence are outside the First Amendment”: “protecting individuals from the fear of violence, from the disruption that fear engenders, and from the possibility that the threatened violence will occur.”980 In Watts v. United States, however, the Court held that only “true” threats are outside the First Amendment.981

The defendant in Watts, at a public rally at which he was expressing his opposition to the military draft, said, “If they ever make me carry a rifle, the first man I want to get in my sights is L.B.J.”982He was convicted of violating a federal statute that prohibited “any threat to take the life of or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States.”

The Supreme Court reversed. Interpreting the statute “with the commands of the First Amendment clearly in mind,”983 it found that the defendant had not made a “true ‘threat,”’ but had indulged in mere “political hyperbole.”984

In NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., white merchants in Claiborne County, Mississippi, sued the NAACP to recover losses caused by a boycott ... During the course of the boycott, NAACP Field Secretary Charles Evers had told an audience of “black people that any ‘uncle toms’ who broke the boycott would ‘have their necks broken’ by their own people.”986

The Court acknowledged that this language “might have been understood as inviting an unlawful form of discipline or, at least, as intending to create a fear of violence ....”987 Yet, no violence had followed directly from Evers’ speeches, and the Court found that Evers’ “emotionally charged rhetoric . . . did not transcend the bounds of protected speech set forth in Brandenburg.*

An advocate must be free to stimulate his audience with spontaneous and emotional appeals for unity and action in a common cause. When such appeals do not incite lawless action, they must be regarded as protected speech.”988 While holding that, under Bradenburg, Evers’ speech did not constitute unprotected incitement of lawless action,989 the Court also cited Watts, thereby implying that Evers’ speech also did not constitute a “true threat.”990

Hooch said...

Brandenberg * Freedoms of speech and press do not permit a State to forbid advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action. Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, overruled. Brandenberg VS Ohio

*Schenck v. United States, 78 in which defendants had been convicted of seeking to disrupt recruitment of military personnel by dissemination of certain leaflets, Justice Holmes formulated the ''clear and present danger'' test which has ever since been the starting point of argument.

''The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree.''

See also 'Criminal Syndicalism' and 'clear and present danger test'"""

Anonymous said...

Excuse me, but I think Nigger Protestant churches are notorious for busing their congregations to voting polls and demonstrations, as desired - so Connecticut Catholics should be storming the legislature - oops - did I just break a Connecticut law ?

David Drury said...

Hooch, I've always watched the exchange of words between you and Apollonian and couldn't determine who was right or wrong. I can now say that Apollonian is the nutcase and wrong because he slings insults and accusations without fact.

Anonymous said...

Look at those beady eyes in the picture. Goodbye pain-in-the-ass Turner. The White racialist Movement won't miss you.

Anonymous said...

Who told anyone to go to Hal Turners website, or his BlogSpot, or even listen to his radio show?

Free speech, it all but illegal these days. I may not agree with everything Hal Turner says. But he has the right to say what he wants. If I were so offended, guess what? Log out of his website.

Hal cannot make anyone do what they do not want to do. If someone is going to break the law, they were going to do it anyway.

I listen to the Hal Turner Radio Show because at times it is funny, other times it is educational. And sometimes I do not like anything he says.

The attraction of his show is he has the guts to say what he wants. And he doesn’t care who doesn’t like it, and that takes a lot of guts these days.

I hope Hal has the best of luck, and can put the Connecticut mess behind him. Wednesday nights won’t be the same.

kathy said...


You made some very good points and we who believe Hals rights have been violated thank you.
This state rep lawlor and state senator andrew mcdonald are using the political power of their jobs to fight their own gay cause and this writer believes they should lose their jobs.
Hal is not their only victim,. In March Timothy Kane a teacher in connecticut was also arrested because of these same (2) public officials. They are using the Capitol State Police as their own personal lynch mob.Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing and although I believe Capitol Police Chief Michael J Fallon is trying to re write the 1st. & 2nd. amendment, until he does we ALL still have the right to speak. If we all agree with his defination of freedom of speech it would say freedom of some speech. Thats like saying you're a little bit pregnant. This is a terriable thing that happened to Hal and his family as well as Timothy Kane & his family. How many more Americans are going to fall victim to their actions.??
No one has to agree with, or like what Hal says, and you are right, If someone doesn't like his show, turn it off. BUT by not standing up for Hal Turners right to Freedom of Speech you will lose this right also. We all need to stick together on this one

Anonymous said...

You all are stupid, go get a life and stop hating. fools.

Anonymous said...

Look you racist imbeciles!! Hal Turner is an ignorant racist. No one wins in a race war! So why preach it! He lives in a predominant latino city and county because his so called 'white race' cannot even tolerate him. If he does not like us then stay away from us, he's a psychopath. Let's talk about his arrest: Hello!! People! Do you not realize he threatened the lives of government officials. ''Government'', not a black or spanish person on the street but ''government'', of course their going to come after you you idiot! Dam you people are so blind its sad...spanish and blacks are going no fact we're growin in government. So if you don't like it I guess you can just go, wait where? To Hell!! Where you belong!

Anonymous said...


David Letterman's hate is as old as some ancient Hebrew prophets.
Speaking of anti-Semitism, it's Jerry Falwell and other fundy leaders who've gleefully predicted that in the future EVERY nation will be against Israel (an international first?) and that TWO-THIRDS of all Jews will be killed, right?
Wrong! It's the ancient Hebrew prophet Zechariah who predicted all this in the 13th and 14th chapters of his book! The last prophet, Malachi, explains the reason for this future Holocaust that'll outdo even Hitler's by stating that "Judah hath dealt treacherously" and "the Lord will cut off the man that doeth this" and asks "Why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother?"
Haven't evangelicals generally been the best friends of Israel and persons perceived to be Jewish? Then please explain the recent filthy, hate-filled, back-stabbing tirades by David Letterman (and Sandra Bernhard and Kathy Griffin) against a leading evangelical named Sarah Palin, and explain why most Jewish leaders have seemingly condoned Palin's continuing "crucifixion"!
While David, Sandra, and Kathy are tragically turning comedy into tragedy, they are also helping to speed up and fulfill the Final Holocaust a la Zechariah and Malachi, thus helping to make the Bible even more believable!
(For even more stunning information, visit MSN and type in "Separation of Raunch and State," "Michael the Narc-Angel," and "Bible Verses Obama Avoids.")