Thursday, December 18, 2008

Fort Myers News-Press Publishes Two Editorials Condemning Palm Beach Republicans' Refusal To Seat Derek Black


In Lee County, Florida, Marilyn Stout won 73 percent of the vote in her committee race but party leaders backed her opponent Brenda Skupny due to a loyalty oath technicality. Stout did not sign and return the loyalty oath in time.

And the Fort Myers News-Press has been raising hell about it ever since. But they didn't stop there; they cast their eyes around the rest of the state, and found other candidates similarly victimized.

Including 19-year-old Derek Black in Palm Beach. And they decided that Derek Black also got screwed, even though he has family ties with Stormfront operator Don Black. While the News-Press staff does not sympathize with white nationalism, they apparently sympathize with democracy, and believe it should be applicable to all.

So Fort Myers News-Press staffers published two instant editorials supporting Derek Black's right to be seated as a committeeman. Although instant editorials don't carry as much weight as regular editorials, the staff members authoring them are accredited journalists, so they're just as official.

Both were published on December 16th, 2008. Here's the first instant editorial, entitled "Is it ever O.K. to reverse an election", published by David Plazas, the community conversation editor of The News-Press.

Our editorial “Respect voters’ decision” about the Lee County Republican committeewoman’s race has generated discussion in emails to me and online about whether it’s OK to recognize an election in some cases and not in others.

Marilyn Stout won 73 percent of the vote in her race, but party leaders backed her opponent Brenda Skupny due to a loyalty oath technicality.

Online contributor Laurence J. Gillis wrote that while he’d like to see Stout seated, he doesn’t want the son of a former Klansman seated as a Palm Beach County GOP committeeman.

Derek Black, 19, won 58 percent of the vote in his election, yet the party chair refused to seat him, citing a loyalty oath technicality, presumably because of his past associations with the Ku Klux Klan (his father was a former national grand wizard and he contributed to a youth message board on white nationalism).

Like Stout, Black won a majority.

And while voters may have been unaware of his past, undoing a fair election could ultimately undermine the credibility of the process.


And here's the second editorial, entitled "Seat the Klansman", published by Deron Snyder, an Editorial Writer/Conversation Ambassador for The News-Press.

The Republican Party of Palm Beach County — like its Lee County counterpart — is refusing to seat a winning candidate based on a technicality.

Derek Black won 167 of 287 votes for committeeman, but didn’t sign a loyalty oath.

Moreover, the oath requires candidates to avoid activities that are “likely to injure the name of the Republican Party.”

It turns out that Black has strong ties to the Ku Klux Klan.

Instead of overriding the people — like the Lee GOP in the case of Marilyn “73 Percent” Stout — Palm Beach Republicans should seat Black.

If they disagree with his philosophy, the free flow of ideas and public discourse will prove it.


It looks like Palm Beach Jewish Republican boss Sid Dinerstein outsmarted himself and pushed his luck a little too far. Backlash against him and other party bosses in Florida is building. The Duke-Black strategy of mainstreaming white nationalism is paying unexpected dividends.

By the way, Marilyn Stout has filed a grievance with the state party organization and is considering a lawsuit. Perhaps Derek Black and others similarly victimized might want to consider joining the suit and turning it into a class action suit.

All previous coverage of this story on this blog can be viewed HERE.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is a good development and the ONLY way for the White Movement to gain the upper hand and MAKE a difference.

The movement must be on higher moral grounds and universal principles that almost everyone can relate to: INJUSTICE, UNFAIR TREATMENT, DEMOCRACY, FREEDOM, COURAGE AGAINST ALL ODDS,

Look at the difference between the response from Derek and what Apolo might say. WHO do you think will have an audience and stir the minds and hearts of the public. A young man who is polite, trying to follow the system, working in the system, or a foul mouthed hothead who is best at name calling, insults, and can't get along with anyone??

Derek is a good example of HOW to get things done.

So we should learn from him, make adjustments and improvements and then make a REAL difference.

Or continue to sink with the WTM mentality and follow Apolo's way: filthy language, false accusations, hates everyone, hot headed, mentally unstable, etc..

This is good news from the good efforts of young Mr. Duke.

Sherwood Smith

apollonian said...

"Mainstreaming" Is Only A Tactic, Only One Of Them
(Apollonian, 18 Dec 08)

In response to "Sherwood Smith" character, top posting, above, pls see earlier WhiteReference blog for 12 Dec 08, "ANSWP Commander...," comments section, wherein I rebut and rather "out" "Sherwood" for Jew plant he really seems to be, given the available evidence.

I'm surprised "Sherwood" continues to show his proverbial "face"--perhaps he's actually paid by Jews of SPLC--or MOSSAD.

Note then "mainstreaming" is only a tactic, one of them, in the large necessary strategy for over-all Jew-expulsion. And this Jew-expulsion will require a fairly intensive Christian-rationalist effort/movement. Christianity must be understood as absolutely anti-semitic, and anyone not anti-semitic is not Christian.

CONCLUSION: Observe the tell-tale signs of Jew and Jew-plant, "Sherwood," insisting patriots must "follow the system, working in the system...," guaranteed to lose and to fail--esp. as we see presently US Supreme Ct. refusing to observe and enforce US Constitution on the Obama eligibilty/qualification issue--see TheObamaFile.com and NaturalBornCitizen.wordpress.com for expo/ref. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

Scipio Americanus said...

"The movement must be on higher moral grounds and universal principles that almost everyone can relate to: INJUSTICE, UNFAIR TREATMENT, DEMOCRACY, FREEDOM, COURAGE AGAINST ALL ODDS" - Sherwood Smith

Your thinking has been poisoned by the scourge of universalism. That's why you viciously attack those who object to it while praising "moralists" like the negro con-man Malcolm X.

If you are truly concerned about the plight of the white race, which I doubt given your previous hateful remarks, you had better check your premises and fast!

Incidentally, "injustice,"
"democracy," "freedom," et cetera are nothing more than run-of-the-mill bromides taken straight out of the 1960's New Left's playbook. They are nothing more than empty platitudes resurrected and tossed about as rhetorical garnish to hoodwink the simple-minded.

But why stop there, my dear sir?

How about adding these tasty, Marxist-derived, rhetorical morsels to your collection:

"one world"
"bio-diversity"
"social good"
"world peace"
"just society"
"human rights"
"brotherhood of man"
"the underprivileged"
"equal opportunity"
"under-developed nations"
"challenging opportunity to serve mankind"
"meeting the needs of a changing world"
"there's no race but one -- the human race"ad infinitum nauseam!!!!

Of course, the purpose of these noble sounding tidbits extends beyond simply hoodwinking the simple-minded. As the late classicist Revilo P. Oliver cogently pointed out many years ago:

"The [main] purpose is to excite in them [white people] a feeling of guilt because they belong to the only race that could attain power over the forces of nature — guilt because their ancestors' intelligence and courage raised them above the squalor of universal "equality."

Indeed, that is the real meaning behind those lofty phrases you bandy about, Sherwood.

Scipio Americanus

Scipio Americanus said...

"Or continue to sink with the WTM mentality and follow Apolo's way: filthy language, false accusations, hates everyone, hot headed, mentally unstable, etc.. " - Sherwood Smith

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! You had first better learn to practice what you preach, HYPOCRITE!

What in the hell do you call your recent tirade against Bill White?

Keep in mind, Sherwood, you are the one who came in here with a big chip-on-the-shoulder attitude while sporting a plethora of logical fallacies to boot.

One needs to make a distinction between those who start trouble and those who stand up to it.

Matthew 7: 1-5 "Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the beam in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when all the time there is a beam in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the beam out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.

Scipio Americanus

Anonymous said...

So Sickus must quote selective words from Jesus. So let Jesus judge me, I am fine with that. But you are nobody and your words are only a representation of the deadness of your soul and the manifestation of the death that is destroying White Christian Culture.

And now you add new words as though they are mine:

So lets review some of your little words and see if they are my words and thoughts or simply your imagination because you have become so bitter with your loser mentality and limited exposure to the world and reality. God has blinded you, and like the Pharisees you think you see.

When we speak of “One World” it is obvious there is one world made up of many cultures, races, religions, etc. Does this mean one world in the sense that all are the same and all are equal? Some plants are superior, some inferior, some useful, and some just weeds to pluck up and burn. And so it is with races. Some races God created so that it can be clearly seen even in nature that some are born smart, some stupid, some productive some lazy. We find the glory of the White Race not only magnified by all the great accomplishments and contributions to culture and progress for thousands for years and all over the planet. We also see the glory and grand nature and accomplishment of the White race in that so many other races and cultures cannot progress unless they become more white in thinking, action, and culture. We also see the grandness of the White Race in that all other Races and cultures attempt to mimic and copy White Racial characteristics, government, appearance and of course desire our women as the ultimate prize of beauty. So yes we are “One World” but certainly not equal, not the same, but we ALL do live in one world: some to rule, some to be ruled, some to conquer, some to be conquered, some to hate, some to hate, some created for glory, some created to display the worst possibilities, but all one world.

What is “Social Good”? I do not know, my idea of social good is this: Let a man work or he does not eat. Let a man work or he does not get paid. Let a man earn a living or he is not worthy of a wife and children. My idea of social good is a man looking out for his fellow man voluntarily, not through taxes and welfare projects. If the Black Man wants to take care of his fellow blacks, that is good, but let him do it with his own wages not mine. The same for the Mexican and the Indian, let him who wants to care for his fellows be the one who works and give. If the White Man bleeds for the Black Man and feels he is guilty for kidnapping the Blacks and bringing them to America that is ok, but let that White Man take care of the Black Man with his own money, not mine. In my mind, when I hear charities, religious people, etc refer to “Social Good” I cringe because it normally means making people weaker, irresponsible, men effeminate and robbing men of self-sufficiency and self-respect. It is amazing how motivated a human will become when he MUST be self-sufficient and responsible.

“World Peace” who wants that? Men grow, create and build from adversity and conflict not peace. As Jesus said” I bring a sword and not peace.” So from a very good man we see we are destined to conflict and war, not peace. I am for war as it purges the soul, test the man, develops real convictions and proves to others what a man really believes. I takes cuts to fight, it takes conviction to take a knife in the back. It takes courage to stand up against all odds. It takes blood shed to make a better world as Jesus himself claimed. World peace is unnatural and contrary to God. The world and nature are blood thirsty. ONLY the wise and those willing to bleed will rule the world.

“there’s no race but one” I don’t know where you come up with this nonsense trying to put words in my mouth. So I give you my opinion since you ask. Who but a nut can believe there is only one race. Though we say one race sometimes to speak of all of humanity, we know there are many races of people: White, Black, Asian, and various and many sub groups. And even though racial studies and genetic and alleles studies have been hindered as a result of political correctness and white guilt, there are huge differences in the races”

Some races are smarter than others: Asian have the highest IQ, Whites next, and Blacks are on the low end. But we also not that the culture of the Asians, particularly the Chinese for some reasons leads to stagnation for at least 5000 years. We know that Whites with middle IQ have ruled and conquered most of the world and built great civilizations that we are still trying to understand and the rest of the races and cultures are still trying to understand.

We know the White Man took an obscure Jewish religion and raised it to a level of sophistication and glory that has never been seen before in history. Though it took many forced conversions, many wars, 2000 years of conflict and is now in decline we cannot deny the White Man built an incredible display of their perception of the Christian God.

When we look at what the Black Man has accomplished after thousands of years, it is obviously a big fat zero. We can even confidently state that the best thing ever happened to improve and open doors to MOST Blacks is the exposure to North African Blacks to Whites and the kidnapping of South African Blacks and bringing them to South America and America. As Ali said” Thank God my grand parents where on that boat, etc”

On and on we could go.

Can I hate an individual because he is born black, no. Can I hate someone because they are Mexican, no? It serves purpose to hate anyone in order to preserve one’s own race OR to RULE over another race or group of people.

When I read and see what greater white men have said and felt about other races even as they conquered and fought them in wars, I see nothing like the ignorance, hatred, and plain evil that consume so much of the White Trash Movement. And Bill White is the best example of that movement and the reason it is doomed to fail. As the details in his case are slowly revealed anyone who thinks this man represents what is good, honorable, and worthy of the White Race and its history is a disgrace to his race.

I think you are right, there is not need for me to continue to post here as it is just another blog, another site that is infected with rabid dogs, not White Men.

Sherwood Smith

Scipio Americanus said...

Sherwood, the very fact that you continue to refer to me as "Sickus" speaks volumes about your character and intentions. If you want to criticize Bill White and his approach in a cogent, professional, serious-minded manner, you won't have any problem from me, even if I profoundly disagree with your conclusions.

But to come onto this board and gloat over his arrest while referring to him as a "dumb ass" is entirely different. You have demonstrated not even a modicum of respect for the owner of this site nor those of us who have taken the time from our busy work-schedules to respond to the news stories and exchange thoughtful discourse.

Actually, you would be surprised to know that I agree with you on many issues concerning the non-movement "movement" and that I actually expressed similar sentiment about this matter on Bill White's very own Overthrow.com blog a few months before it was shut down by the feds.

But you see, there is a huge difference between you and me, my dear sir.

To begin with, I am not unduly antagonist to white people who are, regardless of their deficiencies, attempting to stand up to and fight Leviathan in what ever manner they can muster. I may be critical of their tactics and efforts, but I am not going to gloat over their downfall nor will I curse them out behind their backs when they are not free to respond as you have done repeatedly on this site.

So spare me the song and dance about honor, my dear sir. You know nothing of the concept and therefore have no right to speak about it.

Scipio Americanus

Scipio Americanus said...

Betrayal

Sunday, March 25, 2007

I will forgive much if a man is sound on the race issue, and I will forgive nothing if he is not; which means I have few friends in the intelligentsia because the white intelligentsia has betrayed their race. And by the term ‘intelligentsia’ I mean those who make their living with pen and mind, not necessarily those who are intelligent.

The black intelligentsia defends blacks, the Mexican intelligentsia defends Mexicans, the Puerto Rican intelligentsia defends Puerto Ricans, etc. But only the white intelligentsia betrays its own.

The betrayal stems from a secularized Christianity perpetuated by cowardice.

It is the white man who embraced the Christian Faith, lived the Christian Faith, and held the image of the God-Man in the deepest regions of his soul. So, it is no coincidence that the most depraved, secularized versions of Christianity should also come from the soul of the white man. And the betrayal of one’s own race, the race which was the Christ-bearing race, is a base perversion of Christianity. The Good Samaritan was able to see the humanity of another because he saw the humanity of his own. He loved his own. He did not wake up in the morning and strangle his wife and children so that he could go out on the highway and help others. No, if he had done that he would not have been the type of man who would help others; he would not have been the Good Samaritan.

Of course, this is not a difficult concept to grasp. In fact, it takes a deliberate, cold-blooded dive into stupidity to so pervert the Good Samaritan parable, which is why I say the betrayal of the white race is perpetuated by cowardice. One does not get tenure if one is “racist,” one does not get published in the “higher class” publications, and one does not get the approval of one’s peers. But what about truth? What about faith, hope, and charity? How can we credit anything said by a member of the intelligentsia who bases his writing on a lie and a betrayal of his own? Of course, we can’t credit anything he says.

If one reads only respectable publications from the mainstream press – periodicals such as the New Republic and the National Review – and if one only circulates with people in academia or the clergy, one gets the impression that the hatred of whites and the worship of blacks is a universal sentiment that unites all people everywhere. But if one circulates with older white folk in the plus-45 age range who do not work in academia or in the sexier professional jobs, one gets a very different impression. Every time I meet such people (and sometimes, despite all liberal brainwashing, I meet younger ones), the same opinions surface: “We don’t have a crime problem, we have a black problem,” and, “You bet there are cultural differences – they are barbarians.”

Are these older whites simply prejudiced? Yes, they are prejudiced; they are prejudiced in the way they should be. They have a prejudice for truth rather than falsehood and a prejudice for decency over barbarism.

The reason that there must be such draconian methods used to enforce black worship is because it runs so counter to the truth. As with the enforcement of feminism, there can be no tolerance of any divergence from the party line, because the party knows that the slightest crack in the totalitarian system can bring the whole lie-infested structure down.

Very few members, almost none, of the white intelligentsia have dared to defend the white man and attack the black man. Anthony Jacob practically stands alone. He didn’t mind being called a racist, which he was not, nor a Nazi, which he also was not. He loved the older white civilization, and he defended what he loved. I honor him, and I revere him for his love for, and his passionate defense of, the civilization and the people that I love.


It is nothing short of lunacy, or Liberal unrealism, to attempt to meld civilized white men and uncivilized black men into an enduring ‘family unity’. The two cannot mix: and all attempts to make them mix will work gravely to the detriment of the Whites, upon whom civilization exclusively depends. To my mind it is self-evident that the Anglo-Saxon and the kindred peoples are absolutely irreplaceable, and that without them the civilization they engendered and represent would, with the possible exception of one or two curious deviations or malformations, soon cease to exist. Let there be no mistake about this. When we speak of civilization we are referring to that which is wholly our own. There is no other civilization whatever. At best there are one or two minor foreign cultures. At best there are one or two successful foreign copyists of our civilisation’s more material aspects. But there are absolutely no imitators of its moral and spiritual uniqueness, because there are no other people like the Westerners whose possession it is.

From White Man, Think Again!

Addendum: I think the abandonment of the white race by conservative Christians is the main indicator that Gnostics own the soul of that group as well as the soul of the liberal groups. A love of kith and kin is at the heart of Christianity as is a belief in the resurrection of the body. Both that love and that belief are eroded when the new ideas of race are adopted.

There are two different ways of abandoning the West. The first way is the way of the liberals: “The West is evil and should be abandoned.” The second way is the way of the conservative Christians: “The West has nothing to do with race.” That is tantamount to saying that the Incarnation has nothing to do with Christianity. To deny the means by which God revealed Himself to man leaves man cut off from God. And to leave the defense and the preserving of European culture to anyone but the white man is to leave the white race and all the other races bereft of the spiritual substance of that culture.


“King am I, whatsoever be their cry;
And one last act of kinghood shalt thou see
Yet, ere I pass.” And uttering this the King
Made at the man. Then Modred smote his liege
Hard on that helm which many a heathen sword
Had beaten thin; while Arthur at one blow,
Striking the last stroke with Excalibur,
Slew him, and, all but slain himself, he fell.


From Tennyson’s Idylls of the King


http://cambriawillnotyield.blogspot.com/2007/03/betrayal.html

Anonymous said...

"The reason that there must be such draconian methods used to enforce black worship is because it runs so counter to the truth."

Very good point. Of course the words "halocaust belief" could be inserted for "black worship".
LFD

apollonian said...

[Commentary by Apollonian in below-copied text by "Sherwood Smith," the Jew, capped, bracketed. A.]



Anonymous said...

"So Sickus must quote selective words from Jesus. So let Jesus judge me, I am fine with that. But you are nobody and your words are only a representation of the deadness of your soul and the manifestation of the death that is destroying White Christian Culture. [WHAT'S HAPPENING IS SIMPLY CYCLIC "DECLINE OF THE WEST," BY OSWALD SPENGLER, AS I'VE PT'D OUT TIME AND AGAIN--SEE MORE APOLLONIAN EXPO ON SUBJECT AT NewNation.org, UNDER "COMMENTARY" HEADING.]

"And now you add new words as though they are mine:

"So lets review some of your little words and see if they are my words and thoughts or simply your imagination because you have become so bitter with your loser mentality and limited exposure to the world and reality. God has blinded you, and like the Pharisees you think you see.

"When we speak of “One World” it is obvious there is one world made up of many cultures, races, religions, etc. Does this mean one world in the sense that all are the same and all are equal? Some plants are superior, some inferior, some useful, and some just weeds to pluck up and burn. And so it is with races. Some races God created so that it can be clearly seen even in nature that some are born smart, some stupid, some productive some lazy. We find the glory of the White Race not only magnified by all the great accomplishments and contributions to culture and progress for thousands for years and all over the planet. We also see the glory and grand nature and accomplishment of the White race in that so many other races and cultures cannot progress unless they become more white in thinking, action, and culture. We also see the grandness of the White Race in that all other Races and cultures attempt to mimic and copy White Racial characteristics, government, appearance and of course desire our women as the ultimate prize of beauty. So yes we are “One World” but certainly not equal, not the same, but we ALL do live in one world: some to rule, some to be ruled, some to conquer, some to be conquered, some to hate, some to hate, some created for glory, some created to display the worst possibilities, but all one world. [BASICALLY, THIS WAS ALL JUST A STUPID, BUNCH OF BABBLING BULLSHIT, I'D SAY, FM A STINKING, SCUMMY JEW PUKE, AS I'VE PREVIOUSLY ANALYZED.]

"What is “Social Good”? I do not know, my idea of social good is this: Let a man work or he does not eat. Let a man work or he does not get paid. Let a man earn a living or he is not worthy of a wife and children. My idea of social good is a man looking out for his fellow man voluntarily, not through taxes and welfare projects. If the Black Man wants to take care of his fellow blacks, that is good, but let him do it with his own wages not mine. The same for the Mexican and the Indian, let him who wants to care for his fellows be the one who works and give. If the White Man bleeds for the Black Man and feels he is guilty for kidnapping the Blacks and bringing them to America that is ok, but let that White Man take care of the Black Man with his own money, not mine. In my mind, when I hear charities, religious people, etc refer to “Social Good” I cringe because it normally means making people weaker, irresponsible, men effeminate and robbing men of self-sufficiency and self-respect. It is amazing how motivated a human will become when he MUST be self-sufficient and responsible.

"“World Peace” who wants that? Men grow, create and build from adversity and conflict not peace. As Jesus said” I bring a sword and not peace.” So from a very good man we see we are destined to conflict and war, not peace. I am for war as it purges the soul, test the man, develops real convictions and proves to others what a man really believes. I takes cuts to fight, it takes conviction to take a knife in the back. It takes courage to stand up against all odds. It takes blood shed to make a better world as Jesus himself claimed. World peace is unnatural and contrary to God. The world and nature are blood thirsty. ONLY the wise and those willing to bleed will rule the world.

"“there’s no race but one” I don’t know where you come up with this nonsense trying to put words in my mouth. So I give you my opinion since you ask. Who but a nut can believe there is only one race. Though we say one race sometimes to speak of all of humanity, we know there are many races of people: White, Black, Asian, and various and many sub groups. And even though racial studies and genetic and alleles studies have been hindered as a result of political correctness and white guilt, there are huge differences in the races”

"Some races are smarter than others: Asian have the highest IQ, Whites next, and Blacks are on the low end. But we also not that the culture of the Asians, particularly the Chinese for some reasons leads to stagnation for at least 5000 years. We know that Whites with middle IQ have ruled and conquered most of the world and built great civilizations that we are still trying to understand and the rest of the races and cultures are still trying to understand. [MORE BABBLING BULLSHIT FM STUPID JEW.]

"We know the White Man took an obscure Jewish religion [HERE THE MORON GOES AGAIN--IT'S NOT "JEW," WHICH NECESSARILY REFERS TO PHARISEES WHO ARE DIFFERENT FM ISRAELITES WHO CAME BEFORE.]

"...and raised it to a level of sophistication and glory that has never been seen before in history. Though it took many forced conversions, many wars, 2000 years of conflict and is now in decline we cannot deny the White Man built an incredible display of their perception of the Christian God. [MORE BABBLING BULLSHIT. CHRISTIANITY, ONCE AGAIN, IS COMMEMORATION OF WESTERN, OBJECTIVE REALITY, HENCE TRUTH--THIS AGAINST JEW LIES AND CONSPIRACY, ETC.]

"When we look at what the Black Man has accomplished after thousands of years, it is obviously a big fat zero. We can even confidently state that the best thing ever happened to improve and open doors to MOST Blacks is the exposure to North African Blacks to Whites and the kidnapping of South African Blacks and bringing them to South America and America. As Ali said” Thank God my grand parents where on that boat, etc”

"On and on we could go.

"Can I hate an individual because he is born black, [THE PT. IS THEY'RE AN ENEMY, FOREIGN, ALIEN RACE.]

"...no. Can I hate someone because they are Mexican, no? It serves purpose to hate anyone in order to preserve one’s own race OR to RULE over another race or group of people.

"When I read and see what greater white men [LIKE WHO ARE U TALKING ABOUT, DIP-SHIT?]

"...have said and felt about other races even as they conquered and fought them in wars, I see nothing like the ignorance, hatred, and plain evil that consume so much of the White Trash Movement. [YEAH RIGHT, SHIT-FOR-BRAINS MORON.]

"And Bill White is the best example of that movement and the reason it is doomed to fail. [RIGHT, SCUM, BUT U DON'T SAY WHY--WHICH IS WHAT A WHITE MAN DOES.]

"As the details in his case are slowly revealed anyone who thinks this man represents what is good, honorable, and worthy of the White Race and its history is a disgrace to his race. [MORE JEW-LIKE DECLAMATION OF PRETENDED CONCLUSIONS WITHOUT PREMISES AND WITHOUT REASONING--ASSERTIONS WITHOUT SUBSTANTIATION--TYPICAL OF THIS "SHERWOOD" JEW FILTH, EVEN DESPITE ALL HIS BRAINLESS BABBLING.]

"I think you are right, there is not need for me to continue to post here as it is just another blog, another site that is infected with rabid dogs, not White Men." [GOOD RIDDANCE, U JEW FILTH SCUM. UR BABBLING BULLSHIT IS NOT FOUNDED IN ANY REASONING OR SUBSTANCE, JUST PONTIFICATION AND GROUNDLESS ASSERTIONS, SELF-RIGHTEOUS AND SANCTIMONIOUS--LIKE TYPICAL JEW U REALLY AND TRULY ARE, STINKING, PUTRID PUKE. DEATH TO U.]

Sherwood Smith [A SCUMMY, FILTHY, STINKING JEW, WITHOUT THE SLIGHTEST DOUBT.]

10:48 PM

Scipio Americanus said...

Anchorage Activist:

Doesn't Sid Dinerstein look like a Jewish caricature straight out of the pages of Julius Streicher's Der Sturmer? I think Dinerstein's mug deserves a place over on VNN's hideous looking Jew thread, don't you?

Scipio Americanus

Scipio Americanus said...

"And now you add new words as though they are mine" - Sherwood Smith

No, I clearly suggested that you add them to your list of empty bromides.

Scipio Americanus

Scipio Americanus said...

"Some races are smarter than others: Asian have the highest IQ, Whites next, and Blacks are on the low end." - Sherwood Smith

I've always wondered why the so-called experts claim that Asians are "smarter" than whites given the fact that European man's achievements literally TOWER above all other races. Could it be because modern "intellectuals" are steeped in Judeo-Marxist thought?

Scipio Americanus

Scipio Americanus said...

“There’s no race but one” I don’t know where you come up with this nonsense trying to put words in my mouth. - Sherwood Smith

This is another example of your use of the 'straw man' argument. Once again, I suggested to you that you add it to your repertoire given your muddled line of thought. No where do I claim that you had actually used it, i.e. put words in your mouth.

Scipio Americanus