The flyer above, courtesy of Dr. David Duke, is not copyrighted. Download and distribute at your discretion, by either clicking directly on it, or by clicking HERE. For best results, it is suggested you download it to your computer and work from there.
Just two days after I provided an update on American POW Shaun Walker, we now have an update from German POW Ernst Zundel. Zundel, who was tried and incarcerated for publicly disputing the Official Authorized Version of the Holocaust, has sent a letter to a German couple in Canada, a copy of which in turn has been posted on Zundelsite.org. If you are not familiar with the Zundel case, the website will provide you all the necessary information.
And yes, one could even characterize Zundel as a secondary "Holocaust victim", since he is a victim of the war against free speech being waged by those who want to protect the "official memory" of the Holocaust. Of course, unlike most Holocaust victims, he won't get reparations. But then again, the Holocaust has strictly been a kosher affair. Only Jews get to be kings, queens, and knights; Gentiles are only allowed to be pawns. The Official Authorized Version of the Holocaust is considered so sacrosanct by Jewish supremacists that they have maneuvered governments worldwide into granting it statutory protection.
According to Wikipedia, as of the date of this post, fourteen European nations have Holocaust denial laws in various forms; in addition, the European Union has its own Holocaust denial law, which is applicable in every EU member state, including those without their own national laws. Furthermore, free speech is under increasing attack in Australia, as Frederick Toben of the Adelaide Institute and Andrew Winkler of Ziopedia have also been persecuted. As a matter of fact, the persecution of Winkler was so expensive that he was forced to make Ziopedia primarily a subscription site, with only 20 percent of the content now available for free viewing.
Zundel's wife, Ingrid, announces that as of June 2, 2008, she has filed extensive papers in the federal court in Knoxville asserting the right to continue litigating Ernst’s case in the United States. The primary focus will be on his political kidnapping - a focus denied so far. She claims that she is in possession of some potentially incriminating documents obtained through various Freedom of Information Acts in three countries. These documents purport to show international coordination of the effort to repress Ernst Zundel.
If your time permits, review this previous post where I present YouTube videos of a 1994 interview of Ernst Zundel conducted by Pastor Pete Peters.
Now to Ernst's letter, reproduced here in its entirety:
Dear [NAMES DELETED],
I want to thank you for the birthday card, the E 5.00 and the stamps you enclosed for me. A word of caution! The [greeting card] you sent had elaborate foam pads behind the actual image to give it a 3-D feeling. Although it is nice, it was suspicious even to the Canadian Postal authorities - it was bulgey and it was held back, opened and examined in Toronto already - and thus received “Special Handling Attention”, which delayed it for that reason.
Once it arrived here in prison, it again caused suspicion for the same reason, because it could contain dope or worse. Remember they had the same fears in Canada at Toronto West and did not let me have some cards. So keep that in mind, please, and let our friends know that these nice, expensive cards cause problems for people in prisons.
Plain cards, and even some photocopies are now allowed, even the odd booklet. They do not allow me full size books - they go to the “Asservaten Kammer” and are kept there till I am released on 1. March 2010, unless of course higher courts overturn the verdicts etc. of lower courts. In my opinion - after the kind of “quality” of Justice I have seen and hear of every day from other prisoners - the Germans have a long way to go before they even come near Anglo-Saxon legal traditions and treatments of people in courts. Only Ignoramuses about the situation here and Germanophiles cannot see what ails this system.
They have no verbatim/word for word transcripts in criminal trials, which invites - no, it guarantees! - abuses and injustices. The German system of Criminal Justice can not recover its reputation of fairness or procedural correctness until they restore what was ROUTINE in Germany and is still routine in Canadian, American and British justice [systems] for centuries!!! The Inquisition had verbatim transcripts, even Nuremberg Tribunals had transcripts - although there, testimony could be expunged from the record, which was done for instance in Streichers case where, incredibly, the Streicher Defense-Attorney agreed to have important testimony about Streichers torture stricken from the record at the request of the prosecutors - with the consent of the presiding judges!
Every regime since before Bismarck, including the Weimar Republic and even the Third Reich [and what followed] had verbatim transcripts till 1972 - then it was done away with in criminal proceedings, but not in civil proceedings - apparently. The reason? “To make the court more efficient” - a lie of course. I suppose civil suits can remain inefficient?
Even Judge Blais in Toronto was astonished when I mentioned the “no transcript” situation. But who is aware of these “details of history” as Jean Marie Le Pen would call them? No one!
But now for the actual legal situation on the ground here. -
I still am battling for my mail from 2005, 2006. 2007. There are approximately 1500 pieces of mail in boxes that have not been released to me. I negotiated a release-deal-method with officials - instead, after releasing some postcards and short letters - suddenly 185 letters were seized that were 2 to 3 years old. The reason for the seizure? People wrote me letters and cards that contained compliments, calling for me to hang in there etc.! - That, it was felt, was opposed to the aim of my conviction!
Remember, I am still subject to spot censorship!
I was also ruled ineligible for transfer to the pensioners’ prison in Singen and was ordered to serve my whole time - that means till March 1, 2010 - here in Mannheim. The reasons? They were amazingly frank about it. The Singen Facility would allow me to live in a much more relaxed and open atmosphere, with frequent trips into town to shop, etc. Media people would seek me out, and that would result in articles - and that, in turn, would bring unrest into the institution, made up of mostly elderly people, all of whom would have suffered under the old regime. Thus, for the good of the other inmates, I would have to be kept here, even though by age 62 I was to be entitled to serve my time in an “Altenknast”.
It was decided by the prison administration’s resident jurist - that I would get no relaxation of conditions - but would have to serve my time in full, ohne “Freigang”, which is when one gets to go into town in the presence of uniformed (?) prison officials. Instead I would serve my time, locked up in prison.
I have hired a new woman lawyer. She is a specialist in Prison Rights - and has now submitted these decisions to the local “Strafvollstreckungskammer” - which has a reputation to see things the prisons and the convicting judges do - as a rule. That means we will have to appeal that “3 rulings package” to the Oberlandsgericht Karlsruhe. All that of course takes time. That is the aim of all this chicanery, for every day I am forced to spend in the “non-relaxed” atmosphere - [the opposite of what] I am entitled to by age and tradition - means what in America is known as cruel and unusual punishment. Should the OLG Karlsruhe decide against me, then I could appeal it to the Bundesgerichthof and the Bundesverfassungsgericht.
[Comment inserted by Ingrid: The first instance has already turned down Ernst’s appeal…]
All these legal moves take their time because the Courts are busy, dockets are full. Add this to the legal fees and especially the court costs, which are steep here and have been regularly assessed against me - for instance a 1 1-2 pge. decision, naturally against me, at E 1200.00 just for this one sheet of paper that had to be paid “sofort” [immediately]. My court costs for the Mannheimer Verfahren were assessed at E 59,829.00. To this must be added the payments for legal fees for my own “Wahl-Anwalte” (chosen Solicitors) like Rieger, Dr. Schaller, Sylvia Stolz, R.A. Bock and Gisa Pahl in Hamburg, and now this new Mannheim specialist lawyer. These costs, too, had to be paid at once. [Ingrid and I are] paying off these horrendous costs in installments.
Dr. Schaller challenged the “non-counting” of my two years and one month in Canadas Guantanamo North- (Toronto West and Thorold), with the local “Staatsanwaltschaft-Strafvollstreckungskammer”. They ruled that the two years would not be counted, as the lower court had decided last year already. We challenged that with the appeal court (Oberlandesgericht-Karlsruhe). They, too, ruled against me - the two years would not be counted.
Now I have to decide if [we] can raise the money to go on to the Bundesgerichtshof and then the Bundesverfassungsgericht - and of course for the legal fees for my lawyers.
And, finally, one of the most important legal moves was to submit “eine Beschwerde” (a complaint) an appeal for review and redress with the European Court of Human Rights in Strassbourg. That was one hell of a document to prepare, and I had to wrestle and argue with my own lawyers, to expand the document to the events of my kidnapping and expulsion first from the US, then explain the reasons for the arrest and proceedings in Canada before Blais - and how all this came about. Luckily we gained access to very important documents during the Mannheim and the American proceedings that showed E-Mails and lots of faxes on official letterheads by the highest authorities in America, Germany and Canada, documenting and detailing at least some aspects of this “Operation Atlantik” as the Germans called the hunt for my capture in documents going way back to the 1990s. Dr. Schaller’s document finally condensed all this down to 63 pages - and for the first time explained it more or less coherently, given the constraints and format of these Strasburg proceedings.
The title of the documents is:
“Ernst Zundel gegen BRD”. The date it was submitted was May 8, 2008. All that work, legal research, preparation etc. have to be paid.
As you can see, the oppression of Ernst Zundel continues even while he is incarcerated. Crushing legal bills are designed to bust him down so that when he gets out, he will be effectively disenfranchised economically. The Southern Poverty Law Center pursued a similar strategy against other patriots such as Tom Metzger and Glenn Miller. All the bills are handled and paid Ingrid Zundel and close associates.
If you would like to be put on the Zundels' mailing list for updates or by contributing to their efforts to keep this case before the courts and media, please write to:
3152 Parkway, 13-109
Pigeon Forge, TN 37863
It is permissible to send money in small amounts to Ernst directly to help him pay for stamps, phone calls, and the occasional “shopping trip” to the prison store. Ernst is allowed to receive small bills in cash in Euro or US$ from his friends and supporters. Please don’t send any checks or money orders to him, especially from countries other than Germany. Ernst cannot deposit or cash them.
His address is:
Herzogenried Strasse 111
Need to know more about how Jewish supremacism works and why Jewish supremacists have commodified, politicized, and weaponized the Holocaust? Dr. David Duke is considered one of the leading Gentile experts on Jewish supremacism. His previous edition of his book "Jewish Supremacism" is available for free viewing and downloading on the Zogsnightmare website. Or you can find out how to buy a hard copy of the newest edition HERE. And Dr. Duke's findings have been corroborated by a former Talmudic Jew who was inside the belly of the beast itself, Brother Nathanael Kapner.